IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-hardaker-dnsop-rfc8624-bis, must-not-sha1, must-not-ecc-gost

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Wed, 01 May 2024 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8676C14F6A0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 May 2024 05:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hardakers.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BFGJyI9l3TwW for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 May 2024 05:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [107.220.113.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDB89C14F69D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 May 2024 05:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3908C2341C; Wed, 1 May 2024 05:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.hardakers.net 3908C2341C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardakers.net; s=default; t=1714567681; bh=2hqMTbPv/AOUgIBE1VdNdlQRcafTE7mhqPSMfoDzqWU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=SBEBXP4q/UGRqZrFJhnaE1CzDGUt5A0e4o81VON7xvMhq4AhKjBm9UA6O38HdqFcP Q88cjnxSYjkmYRBhUl6FjIr6Tghu1gQovst2wTuyOB0bBKqyfPdokecwtpQWzYWKMt pXPSbiu7adqauscyOcJwTVfpDrkW75YSWjrRYnuM=
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <168FA998-2216-409E-AD8A-ACC4E05324F7@isc.org> (Mark Andrews's message of "Wed, 1 May 2024 10:47:31 +1000")
References: <CADyWQ+F7mm2duU7N9F=5NadorX4xzUCjaZbNVHBU=NC2HGJr6g@mail.gmail.com> <168FA998-2216-409E-AD8A-ACC4E05324F7@isc.org>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 05:48:00 -0700
Message-ID: <yblmsp9itq7.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/OKtmldBSXnCCMM2h6_2u5TID88w>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-hardaker-dnsop-rfc8624-bis, must-not-sha1, must-not-ecc-gost
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 12:48:06 -0000

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> writes:

> If we go ahead with this these two sentences

[... snip ...]

That seems like a good suggestion considering the direction of the
conversation.  Both drafts changed accordingly, thanks for the text.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status