Re: [DNSOP] howto "internal"

i do not love the 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-10 draft, 
but i would love even less to see it reinvented in our ignorance.

re:

Ted Lemon wrote:
> It would probably be easier to get internal.arpa, similar to home.arpa.
>   You could use home.arpa now, but it would look a little funny... :)
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:52 AM, A. Schulze <sca@andreasschulze.de
> <mailto:sca@andreasschulze.de>> wrote:
>
>     Hello,
>
>     some times ago there was an proposal (?) from Warren Kumari to
>     define a zone "internal." for internal use.
>
>     We consider a major DNS redesign of a large enterprise network. Part
>     of the network is private (RFC1918 address space in use)
>     some other parts are public. The whole network is currently
>     organized as subdomains of example.com <http://example.com>.
>
>     One problem is the inability of users to distinguish the
>     public/private state of different subdomains.
>     sub1.example.com <http://sub1.example.com> is public,
>     sub2.example.com <http://sub2.example.com> isn't :-/
>
>     For that I like the proposal to use "internal." But that's far away
>     from being a standard.
>     So I like to ask about alternatives...
>
>     Thanks for suggestions
>     Andreas
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     DNSOP mailing list
>     DNSOP@ietf.org <mailto:DNSOP@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

-- 
P Vixie