IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pp-additional-contents-00.txt

Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Wed, 16 June 2021 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bemasc@google.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F2B3A208A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jt9ePNSnQ4qs for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E55BC3A208B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id n7so3617523wri.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rZDdche8mzD1qhtnARKnejbPpBP9ZbRnVjpSN0wi5w0=; b=KiwU1XZO8L1oKhrjelPnHkeUzQY+WrFefjB685HKIvHhcE5g8++dHFkKaTwPeyD5Zg 0DhpRWy9imY6CO1d+09VWBKEEfcN8lB18Km0Wlk/aBCoIZ/MuTlq5odAmELZs5vHl8Q9 M8HdNEcqWcIEmFfS5IF9bsAJ18R2XSxYpzbV4X7JsDVNhCNyhFheHs3qaMhU5nfF7UtU HlyShliF/kxhRSyL5NvD5afiRzi2aGQxo65NZc5Xy/VsTi69qiN1FoYyq/LW3GsBY14C 8rD704pfXi1pxipquCfg3DefmXDTbku5YWEdFebFSzgIJYaw6sefLIGtY4AO5PEA5kqw S19w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rZDdche8mzD1qhtnARKnejbPpBP9ZbRnVjpSN0wi5w0=; b=fbVocWznDPb3VeX/DGL1qoN4Ka2W/7LeD2FDRkHJeTMirw+owUkiuqtRBUb2dTmBaK llFG+0SrbvzFFEAc1du8Pn6Xa2IRGp/RhavHTo/vZejwkzvvVvSKZ6I+hc5SAmTR1hql SPFrNz5rFyu+clnB2+9+aIBZLsBpdIm5XORd3n08/WsAN57t9r55eqhXERlMpalNudeZ zzFUlw5Y36GS8L4kmv6ogUI6inOFEbd1WgRT5ZJbxgmYRM2nhbRsFVeuNg2pYzoBVWqh uf4wvp2Xpw2v8KsgdVgeC4feuVoIhnvr14zH6AJJiyQ+FCju6lLfba58dPMhK0ReYvLj kCxg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5321zp1smSx5k2L24LhDGu8h7MQzb2SecjStFy5cL7tugFH1MATM oyxCXiZJNcrhrk/Bjo7zpp1XYt1smAL6vmbl3/VFOg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkGdedIv2o4yjqJcaAiSnWfDaicKzG3NuCuMC4Zt9tTwIN++306E0P0hlybTheW/oRo0obbzwDwxve88C8x44=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:658a:: with SMTP id q10mr239245wru.258.1623865165308; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162386410269.20738.7972356629825313273@ietfa.amsl.com> <F2AC2969-74BF-452B-8C7A-31D786ED4EE0@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <F2AC2969-74BF-452B-8C7A-31D786ED4EE0@icann.org>
From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:39:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsBL4uLbiqJW20sm4tu9oFca8p=ecA7oCdE7EbQM=O-WBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="0000000000005e8b0805c4e592ae"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/OWN3FcwMhbxPLOJCIIzZMNnJAcI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pp-additional-contents-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:39:35 -0000

Thanks.  I'm a bit confused though.  Your draft says "Non-address records
that appear in the Additional section are not considered glue as that term
is used in existing RFCs".  You also quote RFC 2181: '"Glue" above includes
any record in a zone file that is not properly part of that zone, including
nameserver records ...'. Is RFC 2181 not an existing RFC?

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 1:28 PM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:

> Greetings again. Peter van Dijk and I have just published a small
> informative document in response to some assertions about what can be in
> the Additional section of DNS responses, as well as what is "glue". This is
> not meant to be on standards track.
>
> --Paul and Peter
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-pp-additional-contents-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Paul Hoffman and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name: draft-pp-additional-contents
> Revision: 00
> Title: The Additional Section and Glue in DNS Responses
> Document date: 2021-06-16
> Group: Individual Submission
> Pages: 5
> URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pp-additional-contents-00.txt
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pp-additional-contents-00.txt__;!!PtGJab4!t-Aauf-02j5Iyfzscurvs1igEu1w-9aEq0T0CACUcRGD4C7z1rMkRsvVo8rd1hIQ-7H-KRwSSQ$>
>
> Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pp-additional-contents/
> Htmlized:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-pp-additional-contents
>
>
> Abstract:
>   Implementers have recently expressed different views on what can
>   appear in the Additional section in DNS responses.  Proposals for
>   adding functionality to the DNS protocol that rely on non-glue
>   records in the Additional section rely on having a common
>   understanding of the semantics of the Additional section.
>
>   This document restates what has been said in other DNS standards, and
>   does not update any of them.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email