IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 19 May 2015 00:52 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8DE1B2C56 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2015 17:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5pQOsgt5QNxQ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2015 17:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B7F41B2AAB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2015 17:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-98-218.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.218]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t4J0qAGK043496 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 18 May 2015 17:52:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-98-218.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.218] claimed to be [10.20.30.101]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150518235007.6BCCC2E85E37@rock.dv.isc.org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:52:10 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <823C5E67-E5DC-413A-90A7-17C232E46B41@vpnc.org>
References: <20150517225142.52161.qmail@ary.lan> <55591F2D.4090309@redbarn.org> <36BA3DB9-A565-49E7-8850-8151B2940830@shinkuro.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1505181011370.9602@ary.lan> <D17F9846.5796C%francisco.arias@icann.org> <20150518235007.6BCCC2E85E37@rock.dv.isc.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/OaYR9ibDdvs76V27z-f8Ndu6hj8>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 00:52:13 -0000

On May 18, 2015, at 4:50 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
> Can we get DNS and EDNS Protocol Compliance added to the acceptance
> criteria for nameservers for TLDs.
> 
> http://ednscomp.isc.org/compliance/tld-report.html
> 
> shows this is NOT happening.  It isn't hard to test for.  Eight dig
> queries per server is all that was required to generate this report.

How is this related to special use names? The purpose of those names is to not be resolved in the root.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email