Return-Path: X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947FB1B310A for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:53:28 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.961 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s2bgsW39cqbm for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:53:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [85.30.129.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C7FF1B3102 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:53:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.143] (unknown [31.15.50.130]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 124861FEAD for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 07:53:25 +0100 (CET) From: "Patrik =?utf-8?b?RsOkbHRzdHLDtm0=?=" To: dnsop@ietf.org Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 07:53:25 +0100 Message-ID: <314D2303-5654-4BA3-A190-F658DAF60E31@frobbit.se> In-Reply-To: <20151111064744.GW18315@mournblade.imrryr.org> References: <20151105235402.39FFC3BF2F29@rock.dv.isc.org> <20151110152511.6f1a1c20@pallas.home.time-travellers.org> <20151110204330.C47C63C7D699@rock.dv.isc.org> <7B4B7DEA-C705-437E-8BC1-64D96D55014E@vpnc.org> <0F2DD78A-69C4-49DA-936F-C32D0FC97CC2@rfc1035.com> <5373DDAB-1ED2-489B-AB62-BA7CF6D3DB48@frobbit.se> <20151111064744.GW18315@mournblade.imrryr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_9CBAB28A-3193-4C91-AD86-F0C1D5147D2C_="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.3r5164) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Asking TLD's to perform checks. X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 06:53:28 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 3156 and 4880). --=_MailMate_9CBAB28A-3193-4C91-AD86-F0C1D5147D2C_= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11 Nov 2015, at 7:47, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > It may not be possible for everyone to agree on a comprehensive > set of 'wrongs' with no omissions, but it should be possible to > get consensus on a core set of 'wrongs' that are not controversial. Yes and no. I think going for a minimum will be a good goal, but for exam= ple to have lame delegations must by definition be allowed, as some regis= tration policies do require delegation (i.e. NS records). So people add N= S records in parent zone, but nothing responds there. Until policy allows= registration without delegation, you will see lame delegations. Patrik --=_MailMate_9CBAB28A-3193-4C91-AD86-F0C1D5147D2C_= Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlZC5eUACgkQrMabGguI182RaACeMxwTjfZhLbPxPRakmZ9gt6xa gt4An3N9V8kH66KD6DlWRODGYC1TC+q7 =Lszp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_MailMate_9CBAB28A-3193-4C91-AD86-F0C1D5147D2C_=--