Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error and combinations of EDEs and RCODEs

Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> Wed, 11 September 2019 05:21 UTC

Return-Path: <each@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BEC12022D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 22:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qBTCaW9X8BBO for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 22:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B8D11200CE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 22:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [149.20.1.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AD643AB010; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 05:21:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id E8DE74D665; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 05:21:14 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 05:21:14 +0000
From: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190911052114.GB62502@isc.org>
References: <EA557043-34D1-43EA-B750-4A17CFC6BE50@icann.org> <ybl36h4aj8x.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <AFE92D06-8418-4451-A827-D5656C83B796@icann.org> <yblzhjbeova.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <067589D2-8E7E-47FA-867C-72E266A55D6D@icann.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <067589D2-8E7E-47FA-867C-72E266A55D6D@icann.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Oo3XQ10y0hTMAVg1AGX2rwORico>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error and combinations of EDEs and RCODEs
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 05:21:17 -0000

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:42:53AM +0000, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Thanks. However, I still think this opens a lot of security holes if
> developers try to be "smart" by assuming that some EDEs only make sense
> with some RCODEs. If I'm in the rough, I'll be quiet.

Sorry, I'm a bit slow tonight; can you explain in more detail the
security hole you foresee, and how Wes's suggestion fails to address
it?

-- 
Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.