Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Mon, 25 June 2018 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089B6130F2D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 14:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0HkOp-6M6lqD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 14:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90580130E5E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 14:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [88.212.170.147] (port=57903 helo=rays-mbp.local) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1fXYnR-0001zs-2W (Exim 4.72) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Mon, 25 Jun 2018 22:13:13 +0100
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20180625210807.7791A2888379@ary.local>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <20eba6b1-af10-e4c6-60be-a742d559602a@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 22:13:15 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180625210807.7791A2888379@ary.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/P-NvmLEwFdDlJvXdiClyZebJ25w>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 21:13:33 -0000

On 25/06/2018 22:08, John Levine wrote:

> One minor point in attrleaf, is whether to mention the poor
> interactions between _names and wildcards.  One issue is that
> _blah.*.example doesn't work, the other is that *.example will match
> underscored names which can be surprising if it has RRs of a type that
> might be underscored, notably TXT.

Isn't the issue with wildcards already well addressed in the IAB
document on extending the DNS ?  (RFC 5507).

Ray