IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-arends-private-use-tld

Roy Arends <roy.arends@icann.org> Sun, 14 June 2020 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <roy.arends@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F393A078F; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 11:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MM230X31tSC9; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 11:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa4.dc.icann.org (ppa4.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 720EE3A03EA; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 11:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PFE112-VA-2.pexch112.icann.org (out.east.pexch112.icann.org [162.216.194.10]) by ppa4.dc.icann.org (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with ESMTPS id 05EI9qMM007876 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 14 Jun 2020 18:09:53 GMT
Received: from PMBX112-E1-VA-1.pexch112.icann.org (162.216.194.24) by PMBX112-E1-VA-1.pexch112.icann.org (162.216.194.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:09:50 -0400
Received: from PMBX112-E1-VA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([162.216.194.24]) by PMBX112-E1-VA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([162.216.194.24]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:09:50 -0400
From: Roy Arends <roy.arends@icann.org>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
CC: Ed Lewis <ed.lewis@icann.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, "dnsop-chairs@ietf.org" <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-arends-private-use-tld
Thread-Index: AQHWQnb+EhqMqEVwR0aaxY6lWR9kxg==
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 18:09:50 +0000
Message-ID: <A4882CC1-1610-4456-A28C-CB4F8304C754@icann.org>
References: <CADyWQ+F=JA6fogcy_JGRJaZv=Hq52ozgmY5gmzfPm=1oHcJXKg@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200614060206.0b09c560@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20200614060206.0b09c560@elandnews.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.47.236]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CBE3320C-84F0-441C-B899-25B12041D671"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-14_04:2020-06-12, 2020-06-14 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/P6mcSwMIh6C4flGD0Xx1q1MhJpg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-arends-private-use-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 18:10:17 -0000

Hi

> On 14 Jun 2020, at 14:59, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Roy, Ed,
> At 08:12 AM 12-06-2020, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
> 
> It is difficult for me to take a position on the adoption of this draft as I don't have enough information to do that.  I have a few questions:
> 
> I took a quick look at the draft.  There is a request to Public Technical Identifiers in Section 6.  Isn't that beyond DNS operations?

This request has been removed from draft -02.

Warmly,

Roy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email