Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CNAME at apex

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Fri, 22 June 2018 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F22130F09 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X3DO2wTFLCBm for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D920130F08 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.1.222] (unknown [206.121.240.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E36C89298; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 22:32:44 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5B2D7909.2040901@redbarn.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 18:32:41 -0400
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.25 (Windows/20180328)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?= <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
CC: johnl@taugh.com, Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <CAJhMdTO2kj+nUqESg3ew=wwZuB9OzkJE6pST=mae7pHiEk4-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <20180619190213.B76962846E19@ary.qy> <20180622182752.GA83312@isc.org> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1806221517590.29829@ary.qy> <5B2D5573.4090401@redbarn.org> <CAJE_bqfXHs5WUb1B03GVwBt-Gh46UtRuJeW-2Kf6buNgJ4eieQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqfXHs5WUb1B03GVwBt-Gh46UtRuJeW-2Kf6buNgJ4eieQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/P7_3A8dB8MPxt7KFDNIJyN1JqTI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CNAME at apex
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 22:32:47 -0000


神明達哉 wrote:
> At Fri, 22 Jun 2018 16:00:51 -0400,
> Paul Vixie<paul@redbarn.org>;  wrote:
>...
>>> Either way we end up importing all of the failure modes of a recursive
>>> server into an authoritative one.
>> +1. authority servers cannot be coerce-able into doing work, whether
>> it's computation, memory allocation, or external transactions like RDNS.
>
> Also +1.  I've always thought there's no point in standardizing
> ANAME-kind of thing unless its ultimate goal includes the
> resolver-side support.  ...

and to be clear, we already created a system like that: SRV. so if 
that's the only way we can do it, it's already done, and we know how it 
ends.

-- 
P Vixie