IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-tale-dnsop-edns-clientid

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Thu, 30 March 2017 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F541294EC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5oiME5JkV-3f for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72EB0129574 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 107-1-12-170-ip-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([107.1.12.170]:60976 helo=rays-mbp.local) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1ctbSz-00037G-Ns (Exim 4.72) (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:54:25 +0100
To: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
References: <22745.38650.113925.208670@gro.dd.org> <04dcb30b-e20c-f064-36be-2b7bcc45d9d9@bellis.me.uk> <22746.53073.480897.456359@gro.dd.org> <a2f28b67-d47d-3f6a-e7dc-faa47e6db5a5@bellis.me.uk> <22747.54720.206457.78907@gro.dd.org> <ea46280b-b25b-a0a7-eacd-05bc40c587b6@bellis.me.uk> <CA+nkc8A=ob4iXmeL44GCyhW0E_Z5YtbFRv52h6QPfNDcycJ79g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <13709563-6144-4f9b-c0c7-32436387452d@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:54:26 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+nkc8A=ob4iXmeL44GCyhW0E_Z5YtbFRv52h6QPfNDcycJ79g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PFWfvc5yMOKWiHqrshDrqf1VtEo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-tale-dnsop-edns-clientid
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:55:12 -0000


On 30/03/2017 09:52, Bob Harold wrote:

> Just a thought - would it be better to have two different EDNS0 options
> that carry an IP, or to have one EDNS0 option that carries both an IP
> and a 'type', and allow multiples of that option in a packet?

IMHO, two options is better.

Ray

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email