IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] KSK-Sentinal: Once more down the naming rathole.

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 21 February 2018 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4516124BAC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:23:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TIYuWxCiZcDp for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:23:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 828F81289B0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:23:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.32.60.122] (50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w1LJNMeC006398 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:23:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141] claimed to be [10.32.60.122]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:23:45 -0800
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.10r5443)
Message-ID: <DC8845C9-6329-4A02-97F9-45C991726F71@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iLqEerV-So7704qu7A2mbD6YQbzdF8A3FEGtUPOE+6NWw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHw9_iLqEerV-So7704qu7A2mbD6YQbzdF8A3FEGtUPOE+6NWw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PLrw2lCQkzdMdgmcbR2lPmpAET4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] KSK-Sentinal: Once more down the naming rathole.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:23:52 -0000

On 21 Feb 2018, at 11:15, Warren Kumari wrote:

> What does the WG prefer? Is the new KSK called "20326" or it is 
> "4f66"?
>
> Hex has the advantage that A: Knot already does this! B: it is shorter
> as a label.
>
> What would y'all like?

Some preference for 20326 because it is easier to read and there is no 
possibility of mis-match due to capitalization. Would live with hex if 
you said "lowercase hex" for the presentation form.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email