Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for: draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 05 April 2018 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A30124D6C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 10:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tL6cvKAX_6NT for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 10:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x235.google.com (mail-wr0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B333312DDD2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 10:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 80so29772891wrb.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 10:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rRGBWzvg36bNjPFUQoq7Zd6pnIQ3EAG2263pxW/Oe5U=; b=gVrVekJrUB6BbxLm5Bb6FjBd2mhZB4wKvrv++pkEBKNDQV5orkiRhvUIH/qdXnOr1K OpkKHtCW/iNhDvVDMPvZOQGmf3/0C0u5uB3l0uCUWB6zAdRsaie7pITJ2mXAvdBGTTsv D0lBm5dt9nmZJJEoI+NZ5U+uhT7T4wcdVRzejRgvs5TP29nlT3R3XVF93BSEaOpsmrRB JqkFA2ysPJqF4wQ37ewoVgZfeN11JQOD7m22SuUyiZYoPa4Vr788q1U3eftUDJBAGSED y/DuGJ/8VrfIA6VB8HK5zKvk3L1FG0B7QIJ2cbk9QPwi/9suh6KaBRrZfzoBaVHDKUjh VZ1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rRGBWzvg36bNjPFUQoq7Zd6pnIQ3EAG2263pxW/Oe5U=; b=qqh+VnnJiaV2uT1jrC1YihM3LjgrMUxOOlL71OaluMtmzF7KC9KgoP+PW8XuINT4qs HFAluM9hOJiWvllOI/foGYikTWesT8S3ysYSXxuGAmLqFRef2OjRgUb09zrLLSyWSOdI uyj05ECD985C2CyM8AZQyEUvbJj3/8BKfcV64Q/C3rXVbS/KtB0lMKxsQ9x+Y/pKb0U1 sAfBgE3E2RTiQ8JJGM+LMUbB5x0q7GTHQVyvzVgtJ47Nnxzb02QNLkIPKAdiybFR8MZT 6ZiYQ3ajDIPxhXe0FiU4R0GHC0lsCoAaGFZhRZBUZhaMEYoLeYQ5DG2SeFCSuo4X1Lyk gySQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7Hb+H1cfMqE8yZQQ8D+FSaR4MNMPyuUX3GGJ06Nv2RrU0Wq7rsS 6Ip9n6uTOsXmndQ3H+Zy/MRxytFZmtAV2z5LBTk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48a3bJOIR5CkDUR/hZvlpt8uedkQ148Gv4LcUxUv0mAFENlbEEYv3sjqfQyG5URAcx1g4M/LYyAoSVOW+8MpMI=
X-Received: by 10.223.200.138 with SMTP id k10mr18141140wrh.282.1522949830281; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 10:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.154.52 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 10:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACWOCC936z-4j8e+d7bvhfr_Mk8tk64tkuiRDTRtrqrBTJBKJw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADyWQ+EE9YCCM03wKvd-HefpoQVqhOfeeLKLV8L2LJj+tqmEzA@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC936z-4j8e+d7bvhfr_Mk8tk64tkuiRDTRtrqrBTJBKJw@mail.gmail.com>
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 13:37:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+HifK3nm+h7aVqHWC8RUA-UhR1Xkkwd73Y1XXK8PS4AhQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e082f6b9ca50d1f05691d6335"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/POuVA9BpFl_cDXAePa6HHF_nmHw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for: draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 17:37:27 -0000

Thanks Job for keeping *me* straight.

Tim

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> While the chair notes awareness of the point I raised, I’d like the be
> explicit to avoid any confusion.
>
> This document is *not* ready for publication. There is no implementation
> report available for review and consideration.
>
> Should the working group produce an implementation report and demonstrate
> multiple implementations before April 15th, I’d ofcourse be willing to
> reconsider my position.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Job
>
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 at 18:36, tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> After walking through the 168 emails on this draft in the inbox, I feel
>> we're ready to take this to WGLC.
>>
>> (We are aware of the two points raised my Job and Paul)
>>
>>
>> This starts a Working Group Last Call for:  draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-
>> sentinel
>>
>> Current versions of the draft is available here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel/
>>
>> The Current Intended Status of this document is: Proposed Standard
>>
>> In the brushing of the camel, the draft is focused on determining if
>> a particular root key has been loaded into resolvers.
>>
>> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments.
>> If this does not seem appropriate please speak out.
>> if someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please
>> speak out with your reasons.
>>
>> This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on:
>>  23:59 19 April 2018
>>
>> thanks
>> tim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>
>