Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-bailiwick, Out-of-bailiwick, In-domain, Sibling domain
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 18 December 2017 13:44 UTC
Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77259120726 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:44:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X4tf5yoUiV8F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 871321205D3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id CCE18282593; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:44:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id C625D2825AC; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:44:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (unknown [10.1.50.11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9CA282593; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:44:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE98642354A; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:44:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B0F7A401D4; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:44:27 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:44:27 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: fujiwara@jprs.co.jp
Cc: ggm@algebras.org, dnsop@ietf.org, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org
Message-ID: <20171218134427.4przwtuy3o2jsrm7@nic.fr>
References: <56BEBCFA-D6BA-4BD1-8B95-190375A57C06@isc.org> <20171213.204234.76214525553211985.fujiwara@jprs.co.jp> <CAKr6gn0qYq7mwhf69ykb7RU3xk2tTVLDLtGJGstE0EOsWdiE6g@mail.gmail.com> <20171215.113000.152427157235084555.fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171215.113000.152427157235084555.fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.2
X-Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.007977, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2017.12.18.133316
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PQztKuteNanUwAEIMx1onfz6Hkg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-bailiwick, Out-of-bailiwick, In-domain, Sibling domain
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:44:30 -0000
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:30:00AM +0900, fujiwara@jprs.co.jp <fujiwara@jprs.co.jp> wrote a message of 74 lines which said: > Adding examples as a table is good ? or too large ? No, not too large. It is a very good idea and this table is useful.
- [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-bail… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… fujiwara
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… fujiwara
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Martin Hoffmann
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Martin Hoffmann
- Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: In-… Niall O'Reilly