IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] On squatting and draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 06 January 2014 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2F81AE053 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 08:09:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dUjCoNxlgmEv for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 08:09:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6D31AE055 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 08:09:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D96E2802C6; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 17:09:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BE9280291; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 17:09:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:8::7:113]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FE7B38038; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 17:09:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:09:12 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Message-ID: <20140106160911.GA9632@nic.fr>
References: <20131231000412.GV4291@mx1.yitter.info> <52C323CE.3090909@grothoff.org> <20131231234421.GA5732@mx1.yitter.info> <52C48A4A.6090303@in.tum.de> <4C051985-6E70-463A-9672-02657842754D@vpnc.org> <52C5DA5C.1090605@grothoff.org> <20140102221823.GF8050@mx1.yitter.info> <20140106084704.GC27479@nic.fr> <20140106154859.GE10080@mx1.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140106154859.GE10080@mx1.yitter.info>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 7.3
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On squatting and draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 16:09:53 -0000

On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:49:00AM -0500,
 Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote 
 a message of 21 lines which said:

> (I realise that .onion is important to Tor, but I am sceptical that
> Tor has the Internet penetration that Bonjour did long before 6761
> was published.

Based on a completely unscientific guess, I don't think so. You've
never done shopping on Silk Road? :-)

But I disagree with the method of adding requirments which were not in
RFC 6761 (which does not talk about the size of the installed base).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email