IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Brief addition to terminology-bis draft

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Mon, 10 September 2018 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410C1130DD3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h3EHF3HmvRqF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 430481294D0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:483a:4463:15fc:365c] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:483a:4463:15fc:365c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12BCC892C6; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:48:09 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5B96A045.2020905@redbarn.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:48:05 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.25 (Windows/20180328)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
CC: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <4AA8656A-7D2F-4584-B84D-47E97483CCC2@gmail.com> <5B8D548E.5080205@redbarn.org> <30BF3D0E-1EE9-4310-ACCB-413E019B6D93@isc.org> <CANeU+ZDMLxpS1VLCunM6DRmkLqtt521Q+QSHwdhvMZ-+eGqSMA@mail.gmail.com> <20180910125533.a2wkwdci3won7shg@mx4.yitter.info>
In-Reply-To: <20180910125533.a2wkwdci3won7shg@mx4.yitter.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Pm1pfQd1vyuZwBxIKKnoZ_d_lzw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Brief addition to terminology-bis draft
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:48:10 -0000


Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> ...
>
> I agree with Paul Vixie that classes were never defined well enough to
> be made to work properly, at least at Internet scale.

this thread has further cemented my prejudice against CLASS. however, it 
has also motivated me to define it well enough that we can create a 
global "CHAOS" system, with very different zone cuts, which seems like 
an idea bad enough to be good.

for the terminology-bis draft, is it enough to use andrew's words above?

-- 
P Vixie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email