Re: [DNSOP] Question on RRtypes in RFC 4034 Section 6.2

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 08 December 2015 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AE31A1EF3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:41:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ozcEuhU5_dLJ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:41:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11D791A1EF2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:41:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3pFX1j0B8rz3K9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:41:13 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: mx.nohats.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca header.i=@nohats.ca header.b=mRopbGZB
X-OPENPGPKEY: Message passed unmodified
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c5a31rbW20IE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:41:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:41:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB8F880096 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:41:10 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1449603671; bh=6EGOnaX/aXHRQZ42yEjk6VEVXff6r/17N6C29DHLN8g=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=mRopbGZBLEdSjgkZLFsqWvclCJLmKL8QhORgd/MNLECm+ejb6C0gMsrniouF3NJSZ IOCdOGg5WrPxr801Bd9UiKdcBnB1yq/CDQSFaGNryuMLDiO3PdHDOHvHI0oEwSbALA nQzDOCEjCOmIeKwLo+Eb3MTf7HHbrdJOT0t1cYmU=
Received: from localhost (paul@localhost) by bofh.nohats.ca (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id tB8JfApP031845 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:41:10 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: bofh.nohats.ca: paul owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 14:41:10 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151208193856.GA5997@mycre.ws>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1512081440270.27931@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1512081004020.18633@bofh.nohats.ca> <20151208193856.GA5997@mycre.ws>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PtO0UCeLQAFFM5HUIjXwtt1i4l0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Question on RRtypes in RFC 4034 Section 6.2
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:41:17 -0000

> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Question on RRtypes in RFC 4034 Section 6.2

Thanks everyone for the useful comments. It's all clear to me now.

Paul