Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda updated

Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> Thu, 29 July 2021 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <shuque@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A753A15C0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id URGty1RlhAPe for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x636.google.com (mail-ej1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::636]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C22B63A15C2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id x11so11418619ejj.8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sd/w6EYCZBRqDxcgsTrcM9ab+qAyLJAVCQhnRT6Iv5M=; b=m2H5gr21or5JQwfvRC1VqmzKPLpJ0l5SWCIBh1szk6w+0hugOUqe65wssOhW+JokPN GortN9QFT4l/60gRNgMSYtOBDgAVjko8067YeioN0a9PgvGYLLe17kMvfCiFemBb1IvZ tyvJsDWgaiNLJ+22Ojx0xUMYDTXGYh0LH/4prUZdTPkU9/kDe0csVQ+WsFdZ4MKYh1uc Up0eN6h9AIjOff8N6KQPPaIGTUkqEWsR6bC9uYx9hWKxin3CqkxYxJRn6Sok3e3xvbjn 8cTEl4TSF2nvMKbgRUo7BtUVPxKn4HcGZRY73dI8JGvlGG/hncvPGqARdRK4F0GiJWgW 7OSA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sd/w6EYCZBRqDxcgsTrcM9ab+qAyLJAVCQhnRT6Iv5M=; b=LPrqQoK/iUGrH6zMSwNqHABKzsYAzXvI08LBRTyJz42nsOEEnoxjTa/HF7RWVMhV9G d42klkzyjAecfGv5KpEOvRZrnAaB6UhZIblgSUKJDP8F4QN0CLyKSto+SwJHsE9ZIXZ0 wdLiXqq06ELvxG0CdOv9hAL//E7cNTe60WxgP6badEoi9KvPvvRvUsSjZMLPR0EIhL8j ubBHSjDMcz0Ui4yPb8d1bzAfcd42Mf9dfaQ0VJokpuV8fIVzI6Ei59SVcQUAsK996nif 3gdaB2BMS5CPBZ6aKTG1JfCxGxY4SEAMVUegreFhqmgAt6j7M0p83b3cyQsAM/IwayKk +5mg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531zMRWY6h3jIdxaNCJnzlhkerd7MrVSiqkia+snDpxVULfP58Xz FDXiesXsBdtR3WquTuqABAL/f5Iv8u4uW1wMgAs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwYeUvaw586zfdP6+pD2nMSMHJ+rVVyBqbzysyaI2Rst1Pfzh5/vv49FZfqEPtjG0sKC7kfm7FewNslUyi+EU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2bd0:: with SMTP id gv16mr6199422ejc.49.1627584598300; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0000061c-6125-3abf-4338-3163532624b0@NLnetLabs.nl> <b9af7b62d0fd1697eb8988d4edc5ef7284e28957.camel@powerdns.com>
In-Reply-To: <b9af7b62d0fd1697eb8988d4edc5ef7284e28957.camel@powerdns.com>
From: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:49:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHPuVdVujTY-4cKA3dc=b3TBprs6+w4hfcQUUwbB5eORcm6KKg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
Cc: DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d2dea405c8479164"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PvRHJYAKg4jl-IE6A8K3i9JuMtU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda updated
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:50:07 -0000

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 2:41 PM Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 17:04 +0200, Benno Overeinder wrote:
> > Dear WG,
> >
> > We have updated the agenda for DNSOP WG session II on Thursday 29 July.
> >   The updated agenda is uploaded to datatracker:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/agenda-111-dnsop-06
>
> On this version, I see under New Working Group Business a draft (the
> black lies sentinel) that was posted two days ago. Can somebody please
> explain to me what the purpose of the draft cutoff is, if drafts can
> appear in the datatracker, and on an agenda, after the cutoff?
>
> In the latest version (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/agenda-111-dnsop-07)
> , I see the new business has now been moved -in front- of both current
> business, and the discussion on prioritisation of WG activities.
>
> This is not a comment on the specific draft at all. This is a comment
> on WG process. It seems weird to me to discuss prioritisation -after-
> we spend time talking about current and, especially, new business.
>
>
I'm sure the chairs will answer you on process, but I wanted to state that I
had actually posted -00 before the draft cutoff (-01 posted later was a
minor
tweak) and asked for agenda time then. The chairs apologized to me later
that they hadn't responded earlier and said they could fit me on Thursday.

Shumon.