Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel-04.txt
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 30 January 2018 15:27 UTC
Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8389812EC46 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:27:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=bW4xOGh/; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=kPeb3Q1S
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qHJHj2l79_tY for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:27:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.yitter.info (mx4.yitter.info [159.203.56.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30A9E131830 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:25:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C576BE072 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:25:01 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1517325901; bh=cRa23mnGcXfPm5TzpwY9kPAr4NkQncfZI6CrznsS+5M=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bW4xOGh/RlJ2rG6+40XA4K07yY2UgKND6W1kOIePbVXBReR6/oiGzU0qxzhx0mzLc i+ILwLm5QEp+lLaaMH7LoFsObW+UuvBctggqwlaR4C3i5AOr40tT97LHTTsfbY8xf9 VpI8t/+h1VcMViIzgLEV1M6I1hVwOua50WrBtb+Y=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx4.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q6AYtp7wWL2i for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:25:00 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:24:59 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1517325900; bh=cRa23mnGcXfPm5TzpwY9kPAr4NkQncfZI6CrznsS+5M=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kPeb3Q1S551NQIl8PfttdBSEqfUAzgOU4vsN0j7nlrOVDpeauTN6lUx5+/cJpn26M YDPCdCCumeuy3W/0W1yIICIvTQGsgUV3rWCaljFE9NX5ISZsz/AOxeUw5cOXz6MUF+ HR5I4z2kV+fo1Zt0FNMenskhxJCDtdL0yOh3qQQo=
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20180130152459.GE18485@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <151062636258.5917.14497839377888768972@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180128080134.24987d69@titan.int.futz.org> <CAHw9_iLDid5-3JJ5gffdsR_PMCAEwwxB3i7ORLiBVtKwmt0khQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180129233755.3697ee79@grisu.home.partim.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180129233755.3697ee79@grisu.home.partim.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PzZ3S5HYB2w1B0tObdD_OWzPPsA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:27:24 -0000
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:37:55PM +0100, Martin Hoffmann wrote: > Perhaps define a term for "A or AAAA" such as "address record"? I went and looked at terminology-bis and noted that we use "address record" and parenthetically define it. Should we define it more formally? A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
- [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel… internet-drafts
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Robert Story
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Martin Hoffmann
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Robert Story
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sent… Andrew Sullivan
- [DNSOP] the ??-- thing (was Re: I-D Action: draft… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] the ??-- thing (was Re: I-D Action: d… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] the ??-- thing (was Re: I-D Action: d… Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] the ??-- thing (was Re: I-D Action: d… Matthew Pounsett