[DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-song-atr-large-resp-01.txt

Davey Song <songlinjian@gmail.com> Wed, 09 May 2018 09:27 UTC

Return-Path: <songlinjian@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FB512EB1F; Wed, 9 May 2018 02:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jNenY65fw45e; Wed, 9 May 2018 02:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x234.google.com (mail-ua0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EFBD12EB42; Wed, 9 May 2018 02:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x234.google.com with SMTP id j5so22545798uak.12; Wed, 09 May 2018 02:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JOApcNcw1P8df529qZM80jNZCdd/+Vg+lqOJF0UVtHw=; b=MjvrrVdTcb7whXBz4PZ+tijvH3FmYUlksi3476BO5B4m/QXIHxMTWOK6sP0hZYJfRP su3TvII2yXi5OM5wAL2PCF+x4ThpxDBlqISoNK8XBkqC4Vx8fNcG1eUix/QL7Pm2/1VK JMriu7gJMwMT1wNqepUB7+aTpboF51/qliZcbCGi7fRQKSzDTEOIP/u0P5lTcv4+wPM2 j50Af+KAA0tH9I5omPZi2Ft9fb0LNzSxH2GopiaIkS12hwP1lWS/ZLxc0F6/UPHxoaFe 2vsQs+OYGxxWmTedxIXzy9H2khTSPSxopZOB2pEM4U6p/eeLOLriD9+kMC8swDUkRteZ dY2w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JOApcNcw1P8df529qZM80jNZCdd/+Vg+lqOJF0UVtHw=; b=hRHSoWnyL6vgGb9CnDZa3x17/p2wPNRFNuYgPVnftwSzsjChVsVz+lCTiCdW/Qc0XV sVoFhSTPUC7ZlKrWB0wvnkaPTenYLV+MD1J7f4SQOnNkKNmO2s4CJQ7bdWuTerw3cHrI FBbBlFNqQHrbMdg5xV1+zXSEu9l5Mjvm/yqqrgFEo0ENIRGYk2Ds/cdQDA0f2Mr8NAhI S57AmkCKdeKuTcDuTWYM7wK3PkuMkAxKAhxPB+tb2jNLM4R3IVQTB3YEECy0cZ2tKzuS lhkncbYluKifJ9kaBfmSOpf8eKaxxtR1hPZmYUgbu3bFtBfaIZwR6fWoREe/Vyt+u73R TihA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tB0oq+LZPugfKuki8Z1ueffeGYacUti/R74dbhjxj1ndyr7J/KU pnUDaAtGyth29eoIIX+7DEVDLEYdV9sTPwunxQwQGcpZ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZp28GL3dQUPEGzvrdYT6Xhamq4cnJOB+xktMeo8CkryPufP0UieyVEe1Y26TtULd/KvRu2HRwXCb5RnlwYCaxY=
X-Received: by 10.176.49.10 with SMTP id e10mr34803329ual.159.1525858052217; Wed, 09 May 2018 02:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.94.7 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2018 02:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <152585626039.2252.6615208215483924331.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <152585626039.2252.6615208215483924331.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Davey Song <songlinjian@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 17:27:31 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAObRXJU-xU6Jd79rbi4LTz80Ahbp1jj0opB-9AjH34y0WK4Ng@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Cc: dnsop-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f4030437b8882e21ab056bc28383"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Q0qqO-m7QS23BV9Pc5LHOvRNP_w>
Subject: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-song-atr-large-resp-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 09:27:36 -0000

Hi folks,

I just update ATR-draft to 01 version with the help of some reviewers and
their comments. I would like to ask if there are enough pepole here think
it is a  good document to work on.

As background, ATR was firstly proposed on september 2017 to address Large
DNS response issues in IPv6. It did not cacth much pepole's attention at
that time, due to unclear benefit and potential impact of network
reordering. It recently received highlights by the presentation in IEPG
presetation given by Geoff (iepg.org/2018-03-18-ietf101/geoff.pdf ) and  a
post in APNIC blog(
https://blog.apnic.net/2018/04/16/how-well-does-atr-actually-work/ ). APNIC
study made ATR more shiny and help me to gain confidence to continue work
on this document.

The most significant change in 01 version is introducing one flag bit in EDNS
OPT head called "AT" bit. This indication is usefull for measuring purpose.
And the document is changed to "std"  to define "AT" flag bit.

-Davey


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: 9 May 2018 at 16:57
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-song-atr-large-resp-01.txt
To: Linjian Song <songlinjian@gmail.com>



A new version of I-D, draft-song-atr-large-resp-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Linjian Song and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-song-atr-large-resp
Revision:       01
Title:          ATR: Additional Truncation Response for Large DNS Response
Document date:  2018-05-08
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          14
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-song-atr-large-
resp-01.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-atr-large-resp/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-song-atr-large-resp-01
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-song-atr-large-
resp
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-song-atr-large-
resp-01

Abstract:
   As the increasing use of DNSSEC and IPv6, there are more public
   evidence and concerns on IPv6 fragmentation issues due to larger DNS
   payloads over IPv6.  This memo introduces an simple improvement on
   DNS server by replying an additional truncated response just after
   the normal fragmented response.  It can be used to relieve users
   suffering on DNS latency and failures due to large DNS response.  It
   also can be utilized as a measuring and troubleshooting tool to
   locate the issue and conquer.

   REMOVE BEFORE PUBLICATION: The source of the document with test
   script is currently placed at GitHub [ATR-Github].  Comments and pull
   request are welcome.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat