Re: [DNSOP] draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-01.txt

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Mon, 26 October 2015 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511EF1B3A49 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 02:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GeCRv7-PU5om for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 02:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 703901B3A47 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 02:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [46.227.151.81] (port=55995 helo=Rays-MacBook-Pro.local) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1ZqeRz-0001JX-4g (Exim 4.72) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:52:23 +0000
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20150310.191541.52184726.fujiwara@jprs.co.jp> <5753B8EC-60EC-44F3-872E-94766558EE50@redbarn.org> <20151025104914.GA23386@sources.org> <4681433.xxzpcmHjWT@sume.local> <562DED9E.40305@bellis.me.uk> <7D9666A0-BC5D-425F-A5F4-40E53C2B80C4@dnss.ec>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <562DF7D8.9080004@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:52:24 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7D9666A0-BC5D-425F-A5F4-40E53C2B80C4@dnss.ec>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Q9Ke369P6E7xiwHtpiIDqzv3X1A>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:52:26 -0000


On 26/10/2015 09:50, Roy Arends wrote:
> Speaking only for myself, though I happen to be one of the authors.
>
> ...
>
> An Empty Non Terminal NoData response requires the same NSEC records as
> an Name Error Response.

That's clear - what isn't perhaps, is what the RCODE should be, given
that this text is in a section with "Name Error" in its title.

Ray