IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DLVs and ITAR

Kim Davies <kim.davies@icann.org> Fri, 11 September 2009 23:21 UTC

Return-Path: <kim.davies@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79FC28C21B for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gbRPktXf2gOl for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org (expfe100-2.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.237]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9966A28C22B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.237]) with mapi; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:21:47 -0700
From: Kim Davies <kim.davies@icann.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:21:47 -0700
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] DLVs and ITAR
Thread-Index: AcozM+ld292u07yiQwSz1LOj4Ma/1gAArh70
Message-ID: <C6D0299B.15CA1%kim.davies@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <200909112301.n8BN1MOB009397@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, "iana@iana.org" <iana@iana.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DLVs and ITAR
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:21:10 -0000

Hi Mark,

On 11/09/09 4:01 PM, "Mark Andrews" <marka@isc.org> wrote:
> 
> IANA still has not provided timing guidance.
> 
> IANA can you please specifiy a maximum polling interval on this
> page and inform the TLD's using ITAR of what it is.  A minimum
> polling interval would also be useful but is not crucial.

I can't provide good guidance, because the ITAR is "live". If we get a valid
add request then it goes in, if we have a valid remove request it comes out.
We could get three different changes in the span of an hour, or we could get
no requests in the span of a whole month. Revisions to the registry are not
batched into scheduled intervals, like, say, the root zone. Maybe they
should be?

Right now, since the initial activity populating the repository, there are
only a couple of ITAR change events per month, but we have no pattern as to
when they can occur.

kim

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status