[DNSOP] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis
Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 26 June 2024 20:46 UTC
Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44680C14CF0C; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6fQM0eZjwA1h; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6357DC14F711; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-57d4ee2aaabso962789a12.2; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1719434768; x=1720039568; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=55AZlRDAzLmD0TF4NEWoOg3oCPZBVQC/M6cbK6PAh+k=; b=K/yuRj2e+LzWTAsqpqrXJkQA6U5PiJdGS4lRlCFtD0LJAwq0LhH/U6/0rc3AQ6wrPK litgkJqrSb868NY2C8xq6eUIdGX5M3daXAjdaTdS+0RAMxmrP1vnZuk/yfoE2oqMfMhK cHCZCBvznXyEHtNwCte1D8hI3mkEexY5mmIyhlu2UTxipqy4+G1io9JNhbqLZeXexnoq TKOEC282D5hnyAI3HdMaQP/UYjYerrFd6V9xgHdBZJzzQ9dG4l5cpe3GVknVNfIqEcRZ 7rylW6n9BLtvBgo7NC3WbSLxjPbPQe1qUVNgPtdCHnFd85J/MOPzL1hVpB4rZrvOlCNi ta+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719434768; x=1720039568; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=55AZlRDAzLmD0TF4NEWoOg3oCPZBVQC/M6cbK6PAh+k=; b=vGk3obL3ajYFalebyTcTjYd9j8mSdf3IzHou+10M7+tTzFGz0EzDjUc/lDgC5M7uTN 0v8XFyuFxstpyoA1s8Ja3jT+PnIguLPaUePtZKP0B2hW5n3k5qRC1lwV8P7cw03V3Lzb jr88yMMVuo5Bdey6uZA5jT0em/J5y2Q6NUtLoseKLwqkeNSdXLUGEj18qa0Mnl4VoYER ECydCuj7vY8auEbDY1/+G8LDsAr4tGdoMH9fSVi68exPZpAcR+x6BRuVhjCXCzaDpcue FWsWr+qDSu9tdlqj6U8cVgZN2mXLfiyTa2JVeHSKF5+L8gF+Uue7dPogM8Rp/3qqWz+g VmgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwSEQZq1TEYvCU5PNU7dNA6X8QCCArOj6RFRfXi9tO3IG/OMoia fVX+/k1YCbkIAO2BjRaclDIy7a+GoE+Duxpu29l2DL7rI0XBwCr9yAr/Kgr4t7HMDFkES90sWpx 4dIdZ00kg6hT1MH5UvGgTtFnVW9ogG5nC
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH4FHF2cpZuQU0CzQg2Xmrizh7cMww7I61QAcCcvU1/Yv/diRqrG98rTo3D7XXfkMkPMt/2yvqaiWXEY+TypZY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:35d4:b0:57c:a7fe:d275 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-57d4bdca699mr10172534a12.32.1719434767573; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+EGh2N8tssBRskH=PVXV1e1eON4z=8E1JWPypNUyZVwLg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+EGh2N8tssBRskH=PVXV1e1eON4z=8E1JWPypNUyZVwLg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:45:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+F6u-2nqunu6sSkVR6S0vpTaDg6pvh+u-W8fjkPNRH2fQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000892ef5061bd11abe"
Message-ID-Hash: 5CEUL2NIC4TFLWCG4EOLVQ6BI5CYJQ3A
X-Message-ID-Hash: 5CEUL2NIC4TFLWCG4EOLVQ6BI5CYJQ3A
X-MailFrom: tjw.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/QWoUbZgtbqCFGKKjfCzXknBa0sA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>
Hi This is a reminder that the WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis still has one week remaining. We've received two reviews and comments, but we would like to receive some more from the working group. Thanks tim On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 12:32 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > All > > The authors have updated the document based on some early reviews. Since > this is an update from the original RFC7958, I urge folks to take a look at > the diff from the original: > > > > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=rfc7958&url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis-02&difftype=--html > > > > This starts a Working Group Last Call for: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis > "DNSSEC Trust Anchor Publication for the Root Zone" > > Current versions of the draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis/ > > The Current Intended Status of this document is: Informational > > Benno will be the document shepherd > > Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. > > For WGLC, we need positive support and constructive comments; lack of > objection is not enough. > So if you think this draft should be published as an RFC, please say so. > > If you feel the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out > with your reasons. > > > This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on: July > 3rd, 2024 > > thanks > > > tim >
- [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dn… Tim Wicinski
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Working Group Last Call for dra… James Mitchell
- [DNSOP] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-iet… Tim Wicinski
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Working Group Last Call for dra… Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-iet… John R Levine
- [DNSOP] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-iet… Florian Obser
- [DNSOP] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-iet… Peter Thomassen
- [DNSOP] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-iet… Ben Schwartz
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: Working Group Last Call for… Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Working Group Last Call for dra… Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: Working Group Last Call for… Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-iet… Tim Wicinski
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: Working Group Last Call for… Peter Thomassen
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: Working Group Last Call for… Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: Working Group Last Call for… Paul Hoffman