IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNS terminology: "In-bailiwick response", "Out-of-bailiwick response"

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Thu, 19 March 2015 10:36 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC4C1A0173 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 03:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.363
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.363 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yKaVps-fFkvn for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 03:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BAB51A87E4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 03:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cb:750d:133c:2fd4:eaf7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cb:750d:133c:2fd4:eaf7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0619213B65; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:36:41 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <550AA6B5.8090805@redbarn.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 03:36:37 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Windows/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
References: <20150318025644.GA10290@mycre.ws> <20150318212949.GA22886@mycre.ws> <C3E84A72-AD36-4574-ADE5-646ECF7754D3@vpnc.org> <20150319021920.GK5743@mx1.yitter.info> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1503191012520.23307@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1503191012520.23307@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040406020408030505040704"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Qc9Ehx4RsDKPhcE4HyjFflJ_jOc>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNS terminology: "In-bailiwick response", "Out-of-bailiwick response"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:36:41 -0000


> Tony Finch <mailto:dot@dotat.at>
> Thursday, March 19, 2015 3:23 AM
>
> My understanding is that "bailiwick" was originally applied to the DNS by
> djb. By his definition, bailiwicks are about how delegations are set up;
> they are a property of the zone data not of any particular message.

i can't claim that i knew where the term came from, but, that's how i've
always used it.

-- 
Paul Vixie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email