[DNSOP] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-04: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 16 December 2020 18:55 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, tjw.ietf@gmail.com, tjw.ietf@gmail.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <160814495642.31798.14183403949248148049@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 10:55:56 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/QcWFSCSJDphehI5y1tNyVegyr2I>
Subject: [DNSOP] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-04: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It seems to me the mechanisms in Section 5 would be simplified by using some
the reserved bit to have an identifier for the secret.

[DNSOP] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Martin Duke via Datatracker
Re: [DNSOP] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-i… Willem Toorop
Re: [DNSOP] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-i… Martin Duke