IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 06 February 2017 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255B6129EBF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:57:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X02hjcDN2Rrj for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:57:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F1BF129EB5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:57:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id v23so108815895qtb.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 07:57:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=GKpSvCZ5ZJ/FJY8KayEGjRIlxMNTQxEdzQgiP+sXlvI=; b=mNC7m3deGk0kuq2YHVquiZkC/hR56CRXeBDStj0ANwpB7TZlKBJTcttJCqgvRDEm3C beq+VpOOIePcf1NgXNeYfxRLDDws5oWezEji/Qz7BUEBcrF9/70Sm4MQLjCRJlGMxcQQ Nz4jHz+tG7tdv7QV6a62EYFEtVjARPLvI2AGmFZcMxpFCbGeQ1ML18GyRC8QrEu3Z9gA lRq9f2/EmWMgBODsp3EdmPjBi/xQQVojeO1JEBnXm1NPb/PoX2gRNrhwgzxauRtdlaaH c9bfP3C4fXNfhaK7tr8aP9mso5Dqkz5DgF4XS6jKB3k7/PZ9cPvotLEdnI/mU/BfQuEb LuUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=GKpSvCZ5ZJ/FJY8KayEGjRIlxMNTQxEdzQgiP+sXlvI=; b=n3mFOSbLYihZJqg2g2QpeVXoS9m/qf+dNbSuqZOBac+e4d1AYeLoOBSWUwHi5qopCD nHAsNXMcokwae0eRdaac/v6wZw7dPnnvoUzPS6fuNpwUTOiQGL5SMP0tNC5Zpz3sy2u8 WBUc73GYIpksJcj9UvJ0RRmIKjKkoXpM2k0eQHaPzab4VMXHzDU6oSzIJcioQM23ezrs GvyxvCA24Y2V/dKSDHuhW2WTOsVetroM42A7MGXS1wmODzl9w/V8y8VMuvWfs4iFKVvN /Ddh7aKC+pS1NsCRf5HpT7w7TPR4lgjq9a2VqYOatKN/O7rIQxra13lv9tJQorsczcGY xtpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m84n4RooA0jDYCdsJS77lOyJ7b7amFE82Z3oepYKWnQMYDAamim0L/xCOjtnbyJg==
X-Received: by 10.237.37.202 with SMTP id y10mr10632470qtc.170.1486396622288; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 07:57:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u49sm817856qtc.44.2017.02.06.07.57.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Feb 2017 07:57:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <E02B3DA6-D630-4F3F-B8D4-EF2CCEB58F6A@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8A7B47B1-ADD8-4DB5-8035-21B2A431BA15"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 10:56:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4E481C14-1C2B-4A18-A4F2-582208C1DDE3@ogud.com>
To: Ólafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
References: <6391B5BB-19BD-4717-B9BB-ECD145F7B4F6@fugue.com> <20170206040516.1701.qmail@ary.lan> <CAPt1N1mbzhS19G_uDA8HokVxXuHy5uA7F1c84-1yUUpqZ2ifJQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1702052315130.13902@ary.qy> <CAPt1N1m2mowdCF6igU0TN-FCcjas9AaY-uGma4HgPGKx0Jg4Tw@mail.gmail.com> <4E481C14-1C2B-4A18-A4F2-582208C1DDE3@ogud.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/QgAqhElKI9AnOkE0Qhba8w4sqmQ>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 15:57:05 -0000

On Feb 6, 2017, at 10:29 AM, Ólafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> wrote:
> What RFC are you referring to?

I wasn't referring to an RFC—I was referring to the homenet naming architecture document that we've been working on.

> Why do you think .ARPA is for services?
> It's for infrastructure and homenet wants to join the infrastructure.

What made you think I though that.   What I mean is that it sounds like it's something global, not something local, because of the .arpa subdomain.

> It is waste of time arguing if name A or B is better take the one you can get faster.

This is your opinion.   I don't recall hearing you express it when I asked the working group which option they preferred.   We have a substantial amount of time to waste; the working group decided to waste it.   I don't see a problem with that.   If we need to revisit this later, when it becomes a pressing issue, I think we have a pretty clear expedient solution, as you say, so there is no harm in trying for the solution that we want, and that we thing produces the better result for end users.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email