Return-Path: X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4331B36D4 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:20:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.277 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KFGh9sEEN2fQ for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:20:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yk0-x235.google.com (mail-yk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 494121B36D1 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:20:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by ykdv3 with SMTP id v3so123912154ykd.0 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:20:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=HYdwSWEDIRDwuguYOpzSj+Q28hOdyD6qMcH6EdBJ3mo=; b=kVFFOyB7rSoRM7MXqty/mmemHwmVx4cy7CTCmHwiU4PrGRImpz6cdAyUP4vRuHeS6b 9roL8qgGgEVQGCQPcQD08aMlHCtXQLNd97I57dH3zwoabi2txF3WblmcQFko2eGXQAz1 B6HpAVkiOUvSBrp+fMXXrOXXiaiSmG1AyFJg7df7x7w/mS3PM3zFS9iU9Pqs/rRjpZ5J tQOsPywH1lAnbbMm6K47MYgHVrE58+UWB7f84vK6vGifunFxRDUPnzwHhWKVoEjlNZzv L0Mf6N25xnunClKmcK/+q2OYiPIlG+3Vq/TusHbMuLhHLpwtNRK0MA4eeMt0FP1gZSei qD7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=HYdwSWEDIRDwuguYOpzSj+Q28hOdyD6qMcH6EdBJ3mo=; b=m9idC+KbTx42XnKaCzZmlUvB7XICSGpxot6vl+rVRLBNjsn0l45uPYVzxPjnalL4SH so03JMlnV0Q/xwtNGEfcI49VXXuPEofNIbEVFkRFmaLMY7A5RYkQjsywHXKIrctQz+Ay z7eNkLw7QW97gcsN76h91DXQaZrjIFBIwr412zXlJ6TNQi8zpwBjrBcJwiE0YCtc+mMX riMtDvG0lrnFFsZ9+91SnaV7RYs7BUN9XIUcEgohPn4irVIWM3bSH9X6w6nmSXg7+eBO zISuR7Mgfs4mBYqclY/+yKuR6d94HDKPFmJtQmnfmdePAEGv8DTfmYfIT7I3hnUeN7o5 1/eA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnVsLVUhdjvI7gyI448w+72FovwytcLbFVgEohm0hS/ot27pej45ylZyn9itSOTgcm+JykF X-Received: by 10.129.93.133 with SMTP id r127mr41862001ywb.109.1448644814465; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:20:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20151112185822.20185.55205.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0DE7C85E-C2F9-4569-BD5E-11896DB727D5@dnss.ec> In-Reply-To: <0DE7C85E-C2F9-4569-BD5E-11896DB727D5@dnss.ec> From: Warren Kumari Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 17:20:05 +0000 Message-ID: To: Roy Arends , dnsop Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114d8bc692a007052588e771 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue in state "Candidate for WG Adoption" X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 17:20:16 -0000 --001a114d8bc692a007052588e771 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yah, me too. W On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:51 PM Roy Arends wrote: > I support the general concept (responsive servers are often better > netizens) and will review the draft, so I support this draft for WG > adoption. > > Roy > > > On 12 Nov 2015, at 18:58, IETF Secretariat < > ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> wrote: > > > > > > The DNSOP WG has placed draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue in state > > Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Tim Wicinski) > > > > The document is available at > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DNSOP mailing list > > DNSOP@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > --001a114d8bc692a007052588e771 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yah, me too.
W

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:51 PM Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> wrote:
I support the general concept (responsive servers are often= better netizens) and will review the draft, so I support this draft for WG= adoption.

Roy

> On 12 Nov 2015, at 18:58, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.o= rg> wrote:
>
>
> The DNSOP WG has placed draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue in state > Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Tim Wicinski)
>
> The document is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.o= rg/doc/draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue/
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org=
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
--001a114d8bc692a007052588e771--