Re: [DNSOP] RFC 1035 vs. mandatory NS at apex?

Petr Špaček <petr.spacek@nic.cz> Thu, 07 February 2019 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <petr.spacek@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BD312D4F2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 04:44:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KiWvPT8L7Pme for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 04:44:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC52B130EFC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 04:44:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pc-cznic19.fit.vutbr.cz (pc-cznic21.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.13.117]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AD6B6333C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 13:44:35 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1549543475; bh=5ZC3lWiC5s6UhKlrzmsKUFKUeeOcX106GAs80HLL+8Y=; h=To:From:Date; b=YNNloOp9nd+wa3KOu/FRPHuphvZYyRLawP7pHlxD7lI0w9TDC2GlPYBQjG3YuSdeU b3V2lCpdMARhm4w5BjsUbqu+7U7WNLUtvOvx+0cZPlggIE8ouEdttQjAtW20MVRjmP blIo53gGuF6hxzvTV2Dr2IV+qS2ivEDbMv7UsPHo=
To: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <fcd790a2-414b-491e-01e2-9aa92f7b1c4e@nic.cz> <CC75C79C-E5FB-4C91-9453-103E36EDC505@fugue.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0ciDFoHBhxI1law==?= <petr.spacek@nic.cz>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=petr.spacek@nic.cz; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFhri/0BEADByTMkvpHcvPYwyhy0IDQ1B2+uU6AWP0QJQB3upM/YqxoJBeMQ5SxpO+W6 BsU0hTIF90AKIgiiDtMH1oNhHnzRXqePKORIgL3BbH5OxGcbqCYk1fIKk43DliCN1RcbTyRV REnCRQGWMTUbRS/jQ3uyTAX4rT0NhPWhPy6TMLGEg6WJJz0IzhBEw3TitvAlq6XHbi5EZYwU AHqIcuqr3sS+qkWqlIBlahu1hqhTcmYGz7ihjnWkOFi1rjRfLfudAtgFpUSmsixh2tifdy+C d8OBQbtF2kM7V1X5dUzw/nUBXm1Qex2qohRmCspwqivu7nlDMrLoilmPaeoR5evr5hpIDdfP cJAPTJk4n56q6MTHFJWkGa0yq13AJHLANNjQ/dF+W6Dhw9w2KBpuw0iGZQBBf5G9SQ1xJ+tU 9filaldsTAX1gMkVso//kGEbuRIJnJr7Z8foE/zofFyoAv21VWy2vpgQ3CnEWOZMSmYH7/gZ qcM7nfkjk4zAijpjYA3qlXoWa44/nrkAGvt7sAMsxY1C2H7tr3h3/rwyfbBqQ9nMpNwYLXXa Dil7uzyqlpKDjwWCzYd3sH7ATyT4htrd0BY5+IFimSfHyLwixhakH8E14YYyV9tzkrB7fiWd g7+zDThLtZMvtrehtkjVDPT50xg8TMr68hd3GRWBUJHszMTnlQARAQABtCBQZXRyIFNwYWNl ayA8cGV0ci5zcGFjZWtAbmljLmN6PokCVAQTAQgAPgIbAwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQIe AQIXgBYhBL4m67nL4FmzkQyjW86N1qGlCiHkBQJcEOXhBQkFp4LgAAoJEM6N1qGlCiHkxNwQ ALFyQ7Rrghf0rM9GN2+kgP92Qvot21h8/Je3bRTvoLyhYUXcAMRmODZQ/0EsjExFc+pRwn+E 0GD2TpiorDnRMpJYEmHqenYGIrZ5TE0lHwwu0fi/X3evDY4j68OFlim5Q6+7pHOlZWaRsSm5 T6blSwIaNDFYtBhI0X1ZXTGqbXIUBFuGxolo/xEgUkeDy+6D4R8yT17CTHkuGYYrfUYnoBTr j3xMVil/lNMievaklAL8kRNVl0It4M8VzHTyEdMq7pG0CJ0CfU8COizCsu4+zy8dsxMVE0Su hju05LSsClZ9X1csxSK9HjKq+TG1Hx2qciFHRB1qC2mNIvWTm10Gkj4tLTWcJp3k2Wyv+1K2 sLFxreGOwbx0uR7XtIIBTiiZAiVsjBH0D39qG2ZLz+bJkQvlTDZQuXzsMS51wROvTVxPYcXX p069hON2+/QqJasmpOHhOydGkB3uokA0crqvMOnK+EcueKQQspvdLGiFLefJPuM8VVyR9fFZ YjnX2vfGZbE+MxY8wG4mDbhgxsUORAEtNUH/G0dvTv66fzKpl5q9GIZs7el+1IU31w7KivgS 7fsWcOsdzq4KzZzNBRJtEDoxX4b9lQ8P6ttMlPi7PnQ+iN0OUxKSnAnKQiqKMFRO1zH22vn7 iiF4JMO32//0HcpsyV8oEdjDkSJsFRnDfLW2uQINBFhri/0BEADFp4ZfxSoKTAad0IkFK9CV oZ6XKywYLFNPPhzw++gbvHL2EX7QqhEsqbsWMYpH4jc/Kq55OYYU/lIcULuD0Y9oDR26XFQo u0FeSNnzRGb607U8OFOPQ+ei92Mm1YPQ33GPj8GqbQpkAp35sfjJ64TH/EQY38RN33jsHRkh wtWU/6yo+RZs7cFRuihuLl8FuoP0A5u/x+lNNeIBk8f27LVYrF81NSDDDYjnObCah+QLzGAw GDtjWkBVawpoHWwq58OQSx5piwyOCnFJeFONRcTRgOz239rsEA5LeYfmOGcnNwG6CHoJ5ZdW Jw5OV9BoA7UTHG95xVHV5QiEm6q6igI6wKV2RtFS7Roe0Wt8H7gC41JeqaKTUsGkz6uJraF8 mmKyS8E+mSh3djmqdJNHF1pJqKxAxPYA9Y0jPnYWeEH4fPeOR2YvBjztsye9nOv1AuKNu03d uzocyU95DfP/lwNJr5SH918Vf1t7WcJj9dg6J9Jc5LOwg13Qr31TuZijrMdqM7LJKC/0tOkS eXNoMlHJOIqbqm7N414I0HytbENf7AiyDxNA5TzJKkB0eBPLm2FMQCHLfasJHgbCrQut6nYw 3f3Gn3+PDzGEHI9sfQv/mYvO77oRSGw+3Hy1ToxIncIirAyRpa5KdPLklDpADvpfkXjuL6If ZZ0OIWKLSRa/DQARAQABiQI8BBgBCAAmAhsMFiEEvibrucvgWbORDKNbzo3WoaUKIeQFAlwQ 5fcFCQWngvoACgkQzo3WoaUKIeTg+w/9Gyp5EcB4AoR3vKVxP0SAh1zBher3bh9uGaKTAWt0 +0v8fyZYGEPqZr//9rkodPnXbQnr9ogzjJmZpsPvGPyRZikWjYIwkfM2Vb4BCyr5wQ9++9KB kob5zCQmUw2o7s/gISpFsCC5B0eYusArVDnrCyrroyaxbN6MpUb5lzVMEOCzYljtdrPRAXPL FKRm3ijLV0RcYPzJJVOPV5EzUfCtGsGTXXRI9Y9O/7lFaJ+iWnwygo/Xoi0IgBHvOAj9Gp3Q 0BY+sI6Rgzm9dbddm8gYJ4+FjfZivI7fbdfSubTWvrtFmFdHovIPJYLvXK7hUG22ww4CneIF D4oZSVy9xUoqJf0qQNruzEqTr7y7lbZIzxgPCSVmH0jpgJ1po6RLaJllNA+ZklOQ76fCMiaD 5yQuJluwD5w+acPWTbmZX6DijGHPZSjzeUkiMKctYSRqVUo6JmK0dgwwm3l1/Orb4D3YsLVP QDa4ZrCfSldrGC3zkEJ8iCVSYQwlc0JfIxyn8C3LLxToPYeFv/bQTeDYBjaV7a0SQ/xKUdpg RFzrGrxj7CM2WHcpxCLVK0agobuUO7YXoufHRM6y0rfMwT10baDjh+hLKMshxTqsP55lWvtM SleSGjheVTiZChb3jK0rUPCC4Rg3gDTEQsptC3TgN48PtLpmhsNc4JPm64zlrreInZQ=
Organization: CZ.NIC
Message-ID: <48a12f46-eee1-823e-a448-8f3b0d973f7d@nic.cz>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 13:44:45 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CC75C79C-E5FB-4C91-9453-103E36EDC505@fugue.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: cs
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Qs_ATDYgF_sYQrS2-CNUjgqhtu4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] RFC 1035 vs. mandatory NS at apex?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 12:44:39 -0000

On 07. 02. 19 13:39, Ted Lemon wrote:
> Why would NS at the apex be mandatory?   What breaks if it’s not there?
> 
> (Playing the devil’s advocate—I’m also curious about this, but I think the answer is that nothing breaks.)

When looking at it from resolver perspective, what is the resolver
supposed to do with query "zone. NS" if there is no authoritative NS set
in the zone? Return NOERROR+NODATA?

Returning non-authoritative NS set in ANSWER section sounds wrong to me.

-- 
Petr Špaček  @  CZ.NIC