Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dnsop-edns-tags-00.txt

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 05 March 2019 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3841310B1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 04:32:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tfawupb9p3XL for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 04:32:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33CEA130E9A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 04:32:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:45660) by ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1h19FZ-000k7s-ek (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Tue, 05 Mar 2019 12:32:49 +0000
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 12:32:49 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
cc: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <a472a1ce-5bcb-35ce-8eb5-a4d3cccdf6f4@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903051226150.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <155171606493.5281.3957934874516100450.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5c3cc3f9-2225-9077-fb9e-0fb940bd1c1b@isc.org> <yblef7mp7io.fsf@wu.hardakers.net> <a472a1ce-5bcb-35ce-8eb5-a4d3cccdf6f4@bellis.me.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/QxAiQeQLjz0OS8h7iK0AGGKt2Mk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dnsop-edns-tags-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 12:32:55 -0000

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:
> On 04/03/2019 23:03, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>
> > Hmmm..  very interesting idea, but I'm having a hard time seeing how
> > this will be used in the real world in a scalable and interoperable
> > way.
>
> The use cases on the open internet are probably less interesting than those
> were client and server have a more tightly coupled relationship.

If I understand the purpose of this option, operators are already solving
this kind of problem with views and using the port number space or IP
address space for the tag.

Perhaps the draft needs to say more about the use cases, and give some
examples of how existing/planned implementations are expected to react to
tags.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Viking, North Utsire, South Utsire: Cyclonic 5 or 6, becoming southeasterly 5
to 7. Moderate, occasionally rough. Occasional rain. Good, occasionally poor.