IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was Re: Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf)

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Tue, 01 March 2016 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7731B2F7A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:00:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BnsLt_mjzs_W for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:00:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1FC21B2F60 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 08:59:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [46.227.151.81] (port=53421 helo=rays-mbp.local) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1aandg-0006QD-4w (Exim 4.72) (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Tue, 01 Mar 2016 16:59:12 +0000
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20160301165633.71260.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <56D5CA62.1030206@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 16:59:14 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160301165633.71260.qmail@ary.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/RRLxfknrt-JvufObm18yLlfiWdk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was Re: Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 17:00:18 -0000


On 01/03/2016 16:56, John Levine wrote:

> If you take a look at that registry, it's a stroll down memory lane.
> You'll find NVP-II from RFC 741 in 1977, PUP and XNS-IDP from Xerox in
> 1980, and other great hits from networking history.
> 
> I really doubt that people are going to ever publish _pup SRV records
> other than perhaps on April 1.

Ok, let's turn that around then - are there entries in the existing
protocol registry that _should_ be reserved in the underscore registry,
"just in case" ?

Ray

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email