IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Draft-ietf-dnsop-private-use-tld and the ISO

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Tue, 27 July 2021 01:02 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA0B3A0C2E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FOM20WVFHS_n for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 345CD3A0C5F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCD7124211CE; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 01:02:39 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEE662dWKwXS_ZYMmD8h4HoUAmwTS+hemRsb7rAOBxuJuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 02:02:39 +0100
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3078B0A5-1FE1-4407-9260-987A52A9FA69@rfc1035.com>
References: <E1266434-EF95-4A7E-A167-D5B8F2C1A25F@dnss.ec> <CAF4+nEE662dWKwXS_ZYMmD8h4HoUAmwTS+hemRsb7rAOBxuJuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/RU3QwY4M1AY7aGzoXTyWKZdx63I>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Draft-ietf-dnsop-private-use-tld and the ISO
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 01:02:52 -0000


> On 27 Jul 2021, at 01:56, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Looks like initial query from IAB to ISO is
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1720/
> 
> Maybe I'm blind but I don't see a response...

It can take a day or so for inbound Liaison Statements from other SDOs to make their way to the datatracker. It can take a *lot* longer than that for an SDO to send a response. I think ISO is one of the organisations where a reply depends on how frequently the appropriate committee or whatever meets.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email