IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-liman-tld-names-04

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> Thu, 25 November 2010 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@shinkuro.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2406428C151 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:51:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.636
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.636 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.037, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vrm16ITQGuFR for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:51:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D01628C14E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:51:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crankycanuck.ca (69-196-144-230.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A1021ECB408 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:52:49 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:52:47 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20101125175247.GH21047@shinkuro.com>
References: <20101117091928.GA30093@nic.fr> <4CE9E942.20906@dougbarton.us> <0E561274-43FE-4657-951E-74C8FF0FD307@hopcount.ca> <4CEC43DC.1060709@dougbarton.us> <E7796748-6880-4928-B96D-0024E27E98D5@hopcount.ca> <4CEC69C5.3040209@dougbarton.us> <7B9EF625-1E25-42BE-9546-61C5B7EFC6DA@hopcount.ca> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB43E0037FD1@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <20101124142303.GB19441@shinkuro.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1011251734170.4075@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1011251734170.4075@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-liman-tld-names-04
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:51:48 -0000

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:37:08PM +0000, Tony Finch wrote:
> Yes, but I think that the document should make it abundantly clear that
> this restriction arises from the TLD allocation policy (NOT the protocol)
> and this policy is subject to change, as in the introduction of long TLDs
> and IDNS TLDs.

So what aside from 

   It is carefully noted that the specification in this document is not
   the only factor in choosing suitable TLD DNS-Labels, and that many
   considerations external to the IETF are included in that wider
   policy.  See Section 5 for more discussion of policy considerations.

do you want?  It seems to me that those who don't like the document
aren't actually offering text that they'd like to see in the document.
(The exception to this of course are those who say the document should
not be published, period.)

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email