Re: [DNSOP] Enough to break a camel's back?
Nick Johnson <nick@ethereum.org> Wed, 25 April 2018 12:44 UTC
Return-Path: <nick@ethereum.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5810A12778D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 05:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ethereum.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g4gMRKqB8mFt for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 05:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4719512422F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 05:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 66so6899066wmd.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 05:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ethereum.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qk1IlcI6tuhOeSlPSyXFyPJCPLa9Bw0jKhzIvy1klLE=; b=axKvW0GQhwBbF52mDMxog5VPN+gBjxRppqRjPxxfnDVpiUN74EAZ8UTHLeEbDdL+sU 3pZcDgkak8jtIKp3IqJybq+Zv3pQCIs12F3rrnFKJ2t5qWV1XxNq7ohfSaRYDfCUJALR U7VPDDTiBwV/TWzIvorsVglVaCekdsLMtVhMM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qk1IlcI6tuhOeSlPSyXFyPJCPLa9Bw0jKhzIvy1klLE=; b=ZdZ0KoJHIAWWmjq/MG1Bh2Rmn/xLDyQu/L8pOVwhaP1tKAxsTuthqwJD/EYw21UmHw DuIcthNRwI2ugs/I3o7cwXTa1Ll2wvN5CZcBBA3Dy34GkQTcb5kK3KFYKQbaMb5kEPGD MS37dbDKUYdFe+IbKclokfi83mzzyNfnFN3RYXQcTPBfn2iF8My1jEaMb4n1szRaI8L3 9qc1mY3NucLmbcMgvl4sgTKmHXU134kZWU1p8P4saJefTqXSVc6SmMneyCwTYqm2JO+x isfNsV+Kev5lviRhiE7NuXGt9IAMB300xao78fMtu7Z6oIHX6+x1QTHRHBth3ESNehha lKSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDqJ9HOdnCMS4R17ukSeReOFObcfmQGupK5+tjJgftqupmcP9UA fi7pwodUTb6+MtDATNrtIiUFVmw2GdZ4KljTesiAKNO4
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48r070KUudO22kHnZG6vWfaWl12zF3bfIZnCPebMPLzKw4ZeuVcLUROEaU5KUg2TGvG2M6do/HNRMymykrPB+8=
X-Received: by 10.80.184.74 with SMTP id k10mr38280348ede.307.1524660259782; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 05:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFz7pMsHGv+fY9KEw2cxR6E9-y7z-iwyKxv6DjBf_UWnzZwG5A@mail.gmail.com> <8A0F2EAC-001B-4798-97C5-0FBDAA0E80D7@nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <8A0F2EAC-001B-4798-97C5-0FBDAA0E80D7@nohats.ca>
From: Nick Johnson <nick@ethereum.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:44:08 +0000
Message-ID: <CAFz7pMuEuE1gQQojxjKDRHPZYQBU9m94JEiVmOtuZJjz8AkJ7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c11ae3013f0056aaba10c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/RZmWnA9Ed__s3t-x0zp3oWxa3jY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Enough to break a camel's back?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:44:23 -0000
No, I left out RFCs only referenced by "obsoletes" metadata. On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, 13:11 Paul Wouters, <paul@nohats.ca> wrote: > > > On Apr 25, 2018, at 06:37, Nick Johnson <nick@ethereum.org> wrote: > > > So I threw together a quick script > <https://gist.github.com/Arachnid/c51b450b0c80eb246394aab5c867d666> that > collates together all RFCs with a particular tag, or updated by those RFCs, > into PDFs. And once I had that, well... > > > Your script has —include-obsoletes= > > Did you print those for your picture? Notably some other people who did > these page counts did include those at first as well, giving a somewhat > distorted look and feel. > > Paul >
- [DNSOP] Enough to break a camel's back? Nick Johnson
- Re: [DNSOP] Enough to break a camel's back? Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] Enough to break a camel's back? Nick Johnson
- Re: [DNSOP] Enough to break a camel's back? Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] Enough to break a camel's back? Nick Johnson
- Re: [DNSOP] Enough to break a camel's back? Paul Vixie