IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption: draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 16 March 2017 07:16 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E909B126BF0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DAM90fSsYZd5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CE5D126B72 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 196so1632386wmm.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=iccvpwiCFPpMj4BzlcWUVyo4nhLFWqpAYxvnhnMEjhY=; b=LvQe1VTonh+kG+vNNqKCzhZlF+vX+QjAS7fpUK77J6AfzdmplkaeWhlfEZcKnaor9Q V+C5n8dj5K4VUHdEWwe/4gD7UadbBfgzcUW0IysOLR7dm3p6azqPvTPhAhxqQ3Qcbfqn mK+qKevzz0AUPDUdybYBAAvWl4nAqzUqwOd+4wHPtFOxKrSOnp9HDHq0OBw4hjdrWQZn sPmFmRjg4Zf2+Hn162WsaxJq99PefqE5KbdgvimMIoy63+/dCK08qpo3ccTSQJe0VJN/ SSpgfQYuASYeQQ3WgNAll8KeVXIlLbvEH9VQUjZT3rNShswBd6mmxIQxPSgF0F5gOqfq lZzA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=iccvpwiCFPpMj4BzlcWUVyo4nhLFWqpAYxvnhnMEjhY=; b=oNjBhAKFKo3x/MaES0sJCvOvfEx9AX4VyQZguAnj6sUbaq8ZAOwLi79Q3yZbd1mnwV LLJV/p9jNvExif5I1msxaVrpH1RFs0HVC3pRkeb5hJ+OWa70i8yGpp72F4TRZcSAV1kl cW2Ns8X/cTHqYobPPkDdSLihJ+Yi5J8dFkFyjX9CnANAQV6tCu/HDJdJ3c7IBG/3VAOD kZtHSa/1E10O9QQVcI0iUlLlwHsr1GXyFxQLOqS0CChSE9imqwTsrkW50b30LBejQXYT ZNxhK7wu+YvqYLImd6l4DUbVFOYIRM4xmGoVq6k18CK9xBoWlYzNDae66HU4azVvZoub mPuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2ZoHE9MIUTEynUzsXqoS5ut5EfUohtrZsuylmVKuoY0tNl9AEsMhKtE28joctDf7sD+ZiZHxJxvyxyKw==
X-Received: by 10.28.210.133 with SMTP id j127mr7830162wmg.64.1489648610493; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.178.87 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:16:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+ECthEmWxDbc717BMQo_=PMxz9M0vthDxjOpNW_M7XPTw@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1147217644cdb4054ad3d858"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/RbqEky9OEG-73tDXYs7ICVufB_4>
Subject: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption: draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:16:54 -0000

All

We've had a lot of WG discussion on this, and it seems relevant to do a
formal call for adoption.   If there are outstanding issues raised during
the CfA, time in Chicago will be set aside to have those discussions.


This starts a Call for Adoption for:
 draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations

The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations/

Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by
DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.

Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.

If there are

This call for adoption ends: 30 March 2017

Thanks,
tim wicinski
DNSOP co-chair

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email