IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] IETF 111 DNSOP WG agenda published

Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl> Wed, 21 July 2021 21:26 UTC

Return-Path: <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288513A2AF8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53QG8eRHuRr7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.soverin.net (outbound.soverin.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:fff0:65::8:228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B63363A2AF3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E12921E0; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 21:26:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [159.69.232.142]) by soverin.net
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=soverin; t=1626902763; bh=/vOx6unWLYZTeeaqars7tvy0FCVCVAWtFwToxUf18xg=; h=To:Cc:References:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=W7msqh0iBlxHdrZPo5JBOHLqu5J1REd/6xMnhTAQlQYJilnVfhOihe1TUCMPQqYbg xyKW1QovrG4OaknuZFHHbyb+76VvzOgAJNA4TzgjKtXbi9QY6/bVeZEJOtMQyxSTUS 9fcsQWyjdncssJtq3QLjj3lJRDRtzxT1HsXQwmLAEuH4Vfu7GrkNkQYZhKkjA8BhrV YthF4HkvDGvTSpNPNn4nh1RJgiwkQNU4cIkpIMBRfY6vnsirdYii0Oz7pfjwXOlnfF EC3uOsG95NmNlP1mLLspCqPpZoQybhVIAUiDoxTtyJN7ykmARp0lhtVlayQ1Y7E8TU fPC6WgbXEtYRQ==
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <47ba379a-a2b8-36aa-5f1d-5f8a7db6fe01@NLnetLabs.nl> <91ABABAE-42C4-46E1-B05F-9C666B3F85C7@icann.org>
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
Message-ID: <f198f584-74c4-6b13-ea9e-a20e13f8e3c3@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 23:26:01 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <91ABABAE-42C4-46E1-B05F-9C666B3F85C7@icann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/RgYpS1cMtYSxlMfDnaHknZbCKB8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] IETF 111 DNSOP WG agenda published
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 21:26:12 -0000

On 21/07/2021 02:11, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> 
> On Jul 20, 2021, at 3:57 PM, Benno Overeinder <benno@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
>>
>> The DNSOP WG agenda for IETF 111 has been published, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/agenda-111-dnsop-04.
> 
> Earlier on the list, there was a discussion about how long the queue of current WG drafts was, and some of us suggested that the WG stop adopting new drafts while we pare down the queue. This agenda lists four possible additional new drafts for the WG.
> 
> Can you tell us ahead of time whether these proposals might become WG documents in the near future? I ask because there are many other drafts that might want to become part of the WG queue as well.

Thanks for bringing up this topic.  The DNSOP co-chairs plan to discuss 
current active WG drafts and prioritize existing work in the WG.

We will use the chair's slides from Session I to start this discussion. 
  Tim also sent a questionnaire email to the mailing list to get an idea 
of what the WG wants to prioritise.  This discussion is scheduled for 
DNSOP WG Session II on Thursday.


Best regards,

-- Benno

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email