Re: [DNSOP] new version submitted for draft-arends-private-use-tld

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 06 May 2020 02:57 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B663A0D04 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2020 19:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=Pah56OAP; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=dtT6fET3
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wk_ggnFoLnAI for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2020 19:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8E753A0D03 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2020 19:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 67644 invoked from network); 6 May 2020 02:57:36 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1083a.5eb227a0.k2005; bh=IQ4KA0GKlPirsJIfIuFlgdNPjWJqCd1aaB1KRakX0Vo=; b=Pah56OAPwiJI7O8/Rl07z7e8btfr5tqWP/GyACNT1+w4IZhpZK0D7snsna9gtg/Q3nraTPMlBVVI+7gtJ4+RWzTcDvPjQgsYD6zgiqLzBA9MKXocojXVpM4Mw3kT3nczVhavNgD1mQXqXTP/+fbJxzuWnHtfwH43sJt5ZHJbk+XGcGuZdQM+5CcaEB1tBGeCsE2t2IX/Q4pjV922pgpHHuRZzzp5ZhqsqKlc71auytrZITRYUeTJuJig86H55elZ
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1083a.5eb227a0.k2005; bh=IQ4KA0GKlPirsJIfIuFlgdNPjWJqCd1aaB1KRakX0Vo=; b=dtT6fET35KO9yLoXIFwt7Xij0R9ROSPu2u/Kqt5Uu35sQFUUmvwy8OehGIjPAeSihja0M7LeMMB/AGapCPpS87DgL2Z+xml1lV3G+dunWq8DTQxBLrXkeETmRoMh4DDPgis9U7wfSLtm7/uBkoBcPvxBHzd9Jy7bqWyXgRbXr2Ftj5MJJVCQqZaeX+q5KSJ/GbsKH4CMzsQaAKcrXHFHQPnN02kvmAZ/EnMBppJ6yMKdLt+Lfd9OSKxm2DmTT662
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 06 May 2020 02:57:35 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 920A518D0160; Tue, 5 May 2020 22:57:34 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 5 May 2020 22:57:34 -0400
Message-Id: <20200506025735.920A518D0160@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: jabley@hopcount.ca
In-Reply-To: <5D255EEE-4CAB-44D6-8C47-BBE9C7F5CF22@hopcount.ca>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Rlpu5wMUrc6NiGnJbETnR3RhISY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] new version submitted for draft-arends-private-use-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 02:57:40 -0000

In article <5D255EEE-4CAB-44D6-8C47-BBE9C7F5CF22@hopcount.ca> you write:
>> It contains plenty of examples of how user-assigned code elements are used in the field, including
>other ISO standards, the UN, UNICODE, CAB/forum, and the IETF itself.

I also think it's an improvement, and concur with Joe's advice not to tell IANA to do anything
since they're already doing it.

R's,
John

PS: I don't suppose there's any chance that the IETF could mount an
expedition to Western Sahara or Palmyra atoll and claim .EH or .UM?