Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS.
Mike West <mkwst@google.com> Mon, 27 November 2017 11:54 UTC
Return-Path: <mkwst@google.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16311127A91 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 03:54:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.44
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xu15cFnce-cR for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 03:54:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ECA3124BFA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 03:54:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id d125so31987113qkc.12 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 03:54:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=i0eQl3ZDj2eHDra/3EvYC7C4kSaiVXneY0TdMMN4pbo=; b=KGD1St6Rzr9DMc8MARZQx1CwzZrZLBCJpCTNwngf112NLUy4jEJTz7Cjl9BK5LSyO1 ni8Rn4WLf0eEu/ETeOaR1orTVMUfmbyizi/DVOYKG3OtixvLqie92geLJEBfPeLvoR34 H6TchSVOxT53P1I0Apsa4Jm3JXZJTc5477ud0Ufp2b+ZVY7huh6a3Q5n1njWVNOA2CGn cSKij68ri4FQvp+Vi5YXIqwkgntAsYbZq/O74pyNIB2tnfY6sVVvfyH0ok01PZhTvogT 6Q6hHaFAZqim4bYeN7pFNw7891Xwj/F82yCHBN8hdbI7gXFZSSaTRyrM+OON9+jYp3/l 2liA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i0eQl3ZDj2eHDra/3EvYC7C4kSaiVXneY0TdMMN4pbo=; b=j69Fd9TjEuAmb5MBe7sFjBfxemuKx+gnXKahQX5JblqfVTm0SnvypCrCKsw2Ay8OrU NE8pRkfIpqUH8LZBS0RpYOPNrgbXSlvQlXUjr6EeewbFaeGEJMSTxl5NJZUJNtEOHEIp rC+UTrWEVgMFufB3YhUv76CP7KWlx6AP80D0M6EwPifuRDxz24XE9z4iB3fglOGRyZ7R ECJIevX878r2TRaWPDZU/75wKFboPEnU6BcmaamlLB2C1KrbBNC9hcXqdZJKJ4v1auqz 86xWqiwpUO88i+mbfbk6McsO5omwkd9AvPJssRW9Ffr412X3wP53IA1W6rWyRqArRsE1 7g0g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6qvNVKHkNNp1h/Ue/rECdDTV+oekm9udBKVqUCCpXmyluAcIjy v2161+vhDJwR9O2Q/74EgOvv/g1vAmDBbY4L+nR661Di
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMY3yyW6TwiWisWL+sSOtVDwKpaGbqM1ajFB6ouF6oaYFGCYYzVMGXSKUfT9S4xcF75rzhd1leNM7haYPnttSX0=
X-Received: by 10.55.175.70 with SMTP id y67mr14106590qke.173.1511783680665; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 03:54:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.6.146 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 03:54:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgRjSyzXYvSF1v3C1AwRwnTkpzFnGa4FRCBGGm-diT-XNg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKXHy=dgQmAgsTaNWpj3dYPN2nv7UnZLbe58A9vmya3JNdmHeQ@mail.gmail.com> <57BD04DF-B473-41B8-9ECD-D197232365FB@fugue.com> <CAL02cgRjSyzXYvSF1v3C1AwRwnTkpzFnGa4FRCBGGm-diT-XNg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 12:54:20 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKXHy=eFjdmtP295MmuTq6TWupCqGR=4aCPgYf6TLeOty-raZw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c06e78e445d24055ef5910c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/S5wdjme2ygqsE5qdcls_vFz4R_0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 11:54:44 -0000
Post-{IETF,Thanksgiving} ping. Feedback (or further +1's!) would be
appreciated. :)
-mike
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 15, 2017, at 10:51 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Skimming through the recording of Monday's meeting
>> <https://play.conf.meetecho.com/Playout/?session=IETF100-DNSOP-20171113-0930> (starting
>> at around 53:56), it sounds to me as though there's at least loose
>> agreement that signing a response for `localhost` is not what we'd like to
>> recommend: all the folks who commented explicitly took that position for
>> similar reasons. The current text in https://tools.ietf.org/html
>> /draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-01#section-4.2 reflects
>> this position, and IMO it's what we should run with.
>>
>>
>> Yes, the current text appears to me to be correct.
>>
>
> +1
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>
>>
>
- [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS. Mike West
- Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS. Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS. Richard Barnes
- Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS. Mike West
- Re: [DNSOP] `localhost` and DNS. Jacob Hoffman-Andrews