Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Wed, 19 September 2018 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB6A131050 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zxtKD_ZfNQIC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71F2513104B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.50.141] (unknown [89.236.209.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65437892C6; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 14:41:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5BA26022.5070202@redbarn.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:41:38 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.25 (Windows/20180328)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
CC: Anthony Eden <anthony.eden=40dnsimple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1809191455190.3596@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAOZSDgCGx73HhtkuQL8WQAhAxGv57h53c+R9xG=Es2sCejYDhw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1809191519260.3596@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1809191519260.3596@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/SDLlAgMnZLlELKKOZSGl8f7Nrz0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 14:41:52 -0000


Tony Finch wrote:
> Anthony Eden<anthony.eden=40dnsimple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>;  wrote:
>
>> FWIW, there's still always
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dnsop-eden-alias-rr-type/
>
> I get the impression that a lot of the objection to the current ANAME
> draft is that it specifies that auth servers do ANAME target lookups and
> record substitution; your draft says the same thing. I think those
> objections are reasonable, but I don't think the problem lookups are
> particularly important (or even helpful).

+1.

-- 
P Vixie