[DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de> Tue, 18 February 2020 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934E31208B9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 07:19:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.802
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ynjJW9WgvMuw for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 07:19:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kmx5a.knipp.de (kmx5a.knipp.de [IPv6:2a01:5b0:0:29::63]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FDFF1208C5 for <DNSOP@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 07:19:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-Recipient: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Original-Recipient: klaus.malorny@knipp.de
Received: from hp9000.do.knipp.de (hp9000.do.knipp.de [195.253.2.54]) by kmx5a.knipp.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48MPfF5B8wz4vtP; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:19:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [195.253.2.27] (mclane.do.knipp.de [195.253.2.27]) by hp9000.do.knipp.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEA7723AB; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:19:03 +0100 (MEZ)
To: DNSOP@ietf.org
From: Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
Message-ID: <b34f1b0d-fa65-23d4-1b2b-761b965a2aae@knipp.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:19:02 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:75.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/75.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results: kmx5a.knipp.de; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (kmx5a.knipp.de: domain of Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de has no SPF policy when checking 195.253.2.54) smtp.mailfrom=Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de
X-Rspamd-Server: v1117
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48MPfF5B8wz4vtP
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[knipp.de]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-0.721]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8391, ipnet:195.253.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/SM6b5yH1YZ958aSlO8_XY__bRys>
Subject: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:19:43 -0000

Hi all,

I asked myself about the status of the two drafts. I got the impression a little 
bit that the svcb/httpsvc draft successfully killed the aname draft, but is now 
dying slowly itself. It would be great if somebody could give me some insight 
whether the one or the other has still a measurable heartbeat, to stay with the 
allegories ;-)

Thanks & greetings,

Klaus