IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] port number in HTTPSSVC

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Sun, 05 January 2020 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67488120025 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 10:48:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=portfast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ShfI8lZMzv79 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 10:48:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.portfast.net (mail.portfast.net [IPv6:2a03:9800:20:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56F6C12004F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 10:48:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=portfast.net; s=dkim; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=jG/YfraPmka17QqqPN6TjmFevBj2ulHANVE0FWvDKs0=; b=Ucf2eunbKyCcz2/OnVVkI8xM9 ae1MnfPuVmS0ZAZ/WQDK1FusPLXlXoW2MXUaCy6MAZyH0XYD34nJEP/jNMJ7tkPjosZsyXvh3xx3h EcxabYMLK9H3793qSQtmZDDsEUzqo0rX1tqLjOi0bWAkU6/JSHWnbRBvStJIiHO0gN3kU=;
Received: from [88.212.170.135] (port=54086 helo=Rays-MacBook-Pro.local) by mail.portfast.net ([188.246.200.9]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1ioAwy-0004Cm-Ay (Exim 4.89) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Sun, 05 Jan 2020 18:48:32 +0000
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <1880498.g4XWyb2Ovm@linux-9daj> <CAHbrMsCcokTmgFgyiDRXvLndmzs9nsJayg11az27xSOFnK0ozw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriX=KNhEBO7AxCi+AQTJs4LV1USWmeJuGidTX7gFtFewRA@mail.gmail.com> <fd287818-f38a-4ddf-2796-fdefad901925@huitema.net>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Pep-Version: 2.0
Message-ID: <dc9d1e1a-2726-58a7-0e3a-6c853dfda157@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2020 18:48:31 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fd287818-f38a-4ddf-2796-fdefad901925@huitema.net>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------3767982CDE1036140D6FAB1A"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/SNdQ_cUJScWlbZsy_jtrfU-9fYs>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] port number in HTTPSSVC
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2020 18:48:37 -0000


On 03/01/2020 21:10, Christian Huitema wrote:
> Most of the early tests of QUIC were using port 4433, not 443. Using
> alternate ports for testing is very common.

Not just for testing - many people use alternate ports when port
forwarding to reach services inside a many-to-one NAT.

Ray

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email