Re: [DNSOP] 4035 3.1.4.1 erratum? dig ds root-servers.net @X.root-servers.net
Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Wed, 03 January 2018 20:22 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE4512773A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 12:22:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ozPYmQh-WiQ9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 12:22:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80FD11201FA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 12:22:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:dc3:59e3:1fa5:69dc] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:dc3:59e3:1fa5:69dc]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C27B77594B; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 20:22:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5A4D3B94.8040905@redbarn.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:22:44 -0800
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.22 (Windows/20171208)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Marek Vavruša <mvavrusa@cloudflare.com>
CC: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <E361FA78-84DF-4B42-AFAC-C8C6CC140158@powerdns.com> <CAC=TB121_FjgHBoO6mk3zWWp9kJ2DDkmKnMDZ8k0Gk3dLOK-mw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC=TB121_FjgHBoO6mk3zWWp9kJ2DDkmKnMDZ8k0Gk3dLOK-mw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/SV39ZGTOtEk2qUcpD-srmPkkPLA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] 4035 3.1.4.1 erratum? dig ds root-servers.net @X.root-servers.net
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 20:22:48 -0000
Marek Vavruša wrote: > That's a good point. Personally, I'd favour a referral response since > it saves resolver a round trip (at least for resolvers not doing QNAME > minimisation), it seems in conflict with 3.1.4.1 though as you pointed > here. ... >> I think an erratum to 4035 is in order, clarifying the language such that >> servers would return the referral in this case. I have not figured out the >> exact wording yet (but I will). >> >> What does dnsop think? i think as you and marek do. -- P Vixie
- [DNSOP] 4035 3.1.4.1 erratum? dig ds root-servers… Peter van Dijk
- Re: [DNSOP] 4035 3.1.4.1 erratum? dig ds root-ser… Marek Vavruša
- Re: [DNSOP] 4035 3.1.4.1 erratum? dig ds root-ser… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] 4035 3.1.4.1 erratum? dig ds root-ser… Vladimír Čunát
- Re: [DNSOP] 4035 3.1.4.1 erratum? dig ds root-ser… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] 4035 3.1.4.1 erratum? dig ds root-ser… 神明達哉
- Re: [DNSOP] 4035 3.1.4.1 erratum? dig ds root-ser… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] 4035 3.1.4.1 erratum? dig ds root-ser… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] 4035 3.1.4.1 erratum? dig ds root-ser… Ólafur Guðmundsson
- Re: [DNSOP] 4035 3.1.4.1 erratum? dig ds root-ser… 神明達哉
- Re: [DNSOP] 4035 3.1.4.1 erratum? dig ds root-ser… Ólafur Guðmundsson
- Re: [DNSOP] 4035 3.1.4.1 erratum? dig ds root-ser… 神明達哉