Re: [DNSOP] avoiding fragmented DNS-over-UDP

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 28 March 2018 10:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFBD12422F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 03:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8LapdofKp8Fj for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 03:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C85FF1241FC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 03:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:35210) by ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.138]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1f18gU-000mhc-k6 (Exim 4.89_2) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:52:02 +0100
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:52:02 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: ietf-dnsops@johnbond.org
cc: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <C8DB5D1B-DE6C-4CF5-A78C-0A3BB02C1C39@johnbond.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1803281151280.10477@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1803211607160.16357@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <C8DB5D1B-DE6C-4CF5-A78C-0A3BB02C1C39@johnbond.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/S_Kxcoj4t4QfIsVO-7JtxBfntzM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] avoiding fragmented DNS-over-UDP
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:52:06 -0000

ietf-dnsops@johnbond.org wrote:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-andrews-dnsext-udp-fragmentation-01 is
> worth a mention specifically in relation to PMTUD

Thanks for the pointer!

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>;  http://dotat.at/  -  I xn--zr8h punycode
Northeast Viking, North Utsire: Southeasterly 6 to gale 8. Moderate or rough.
Fair. Good.