Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-01.txt

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Mon, 11 July 2016 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDB512D52C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sy5IChzvQu_h for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22d.google.com (mail-yw0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2733112D563 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id i12so94893296ywa.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=fdCUUPzyZzNXjOO9xIgieo8FV2s6qwlEdDKpLROM2kU=; b=EYNrsH1OXCwjaPx8f9+pioAeRxfXpa+rdQy3zdA9vcw0wI7XiZOTfJ90kjdKTbkvON SkACmoZmj9lccOB/dCsYb1hJa2GBFArM8VpXfpLwn8Q4vW3wo5PhLacpwqclXGvT8YhC naNwmvjYdTpXU1ryejzMbBdZ4sgMf5l1d04OPvAFhLAjcEQtsBaV/pyXipx4HQCw0JXs fbYuUTM+Pock8J9tDcrAeMDNS/GxifuvetJrqJSIT3R0mAVJfpwD06QjED32ZoHe9LDO LCyqE1ro7pPqkgjTz8eLkyZq35RwKAcl76nI2KLjDUXtN8Ay5MkyDmB+Bp9EBGuGYsnI wIww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=fdCUUPzyZzNXjOO9xIgieo8FV2s6qwlEdDKpLROM2kU=; b=LZeCtjhzJJBPvlfXUS3KwipihfTvvgb+fghclOGbr7tDQ7EjxLXBcPP0/RnEwwiCK7 zz2n8lxG0DdnMGjJaZK4QDbA6oVM4TZR7JNC9vmd37ApIGv867ApCHYc6wpSTjy8QBCJ dNcWSAJjBJP7QeQvNuuLY8+TKRYg2Gmjoee6/fs7A3TMGWGVXyIspcdiMeEXV5TaUVhb AWP9Xy8nOnO4x2ulRVepComLH+4fVLISdwycWNTTXv3YFkcycnmzclyiuu5ZRYMG5FFb 5GqxOAs7xIAjzJiIQg6RrCva44tpX4PjY6dzt3yacfvAdU/Y2aHEj8FXADdjx9NBFa24 m01w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIPwvzWjDmtikjFSmIuvxHZlkwtfvLL99p2TDVohx1likD7h/YgOZOgh7kA+avBkUx+yniSkZWZu/mjRCYS
X-Received: by 10.13.236.150 with SMTP id v144mr10761001ywe.9.1468251296805; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.91.198 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160708212004.32168.77392.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160708212004.32168.77392.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:34:56 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8CvLFpHPoHEm3wMwxCjuRnXU118UBX=c+abz7pv_8g6cg@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c082982fd11fe05375de499"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ShJgInOKl3g97lOn1noPPA8uKUc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:35:01 -0000

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:20 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : DNS Terminology
>         Authors         : Paul Hoffman
>                           Andrew Sullivan
>                           Kazunori Fujiwara
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-01.txt
>         Pages           : 30
>         Date            : 2016-07-08
>
> Abstract:
>    The DNS is defined in literally dozens of different RFCs.  The
>    terminology used by implementers and developers of DNS protocols, and
>    by operators of DNS systems, has sometimes changed in the decades
>    since the DNS was first defined.  This document gives current
>    definitions for many of the terms used in the DNS in a single
>    document.
>
>    This document will be the successor to RFC 7719.  It will update many
>    of the original RFCs.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-01
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-01
>
>
 Source of Synthesis
">asterisk label<.>closest encloser<." should be "<asterisk label>.<closest
encloser>."

Page 21
"The oginal defintion of SEPs was in [RFC3757]." should be "The original
definition of SEPs was in [RFC3757]."
(spelling correction of "original definition")

-- 
Bob Harold