[DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Fri, 24 August 2018 16:05 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013E1128CFD; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:05:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis@ietf.org, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, suzworldwide@gmail.com, dnsop@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.83.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153512671800.23080.10672402309953864375.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:05:18 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Skj9xGD4rzrcLu7d3KC6Or-iHuA>
Subject: [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:05:18 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm actually not sure if this doc really updates RFC2308 because the two definitions (Forwarder and QNAME) only say someting like "it is used differently today" but seem not really to actually update the existing definitions. I would recommend to either not use the "update" tag or clarify these definitions. Thanks for the clarification added based on the TSV-ART review (and thanks Allison!). (Potential) nits: 1) OLD: A set of resource records with the same label, class and type, but with different data. (Definition from [RFC2181]) MAYBE use quotes here at least for the last part of the sentence: A set of resource records "with the same label, class and type, but with different data." (Definition from [RFC2181]) 2) s/Section 4.3.1 of of [RFC1034] /Section 4.3.1 of [RFC1034]/ 3) Probably the first sentence should be removed: "The idea of a primary master is only used by [RFC2136], and is considered archaic in other parts of the DNS. The idea of a primary master is only used in [RFC1996] and [RFC2136]. " 4) Why is there (a) and (b) for the definition of Origin?
- [DNSOP] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-i… Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection … Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection … Mirja Kühlewind