IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 21 March 2017 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024C6129B05 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06V4RdzF9vOR for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22f.google.com (mail-qt0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1CC7129A7D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id i34so133884446qtc.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=tykJLQE5klS6qONpSqSCrSj1VqgRnsaaRGuXJb8bYV0=; b=gBhDMv1mZ30/PMt3EtYrOiSIb8VmsJNpXtWq0Oq6kIaIlhyJMd8IDyDLoijbwbBA5K HCQy+Fmd1PfhQgdw7M5M6EdcZAjFAShzSlbEvHzi5P/Hhn9Axgrz4E+ZogXF88UDd8X1 8yCSgn20NYpeHuu57rQ3pZL4xSAumGhPC/5r1UFXiJ1LlbXSKNSA9T4tnIndiOj0YAq1 ICL9BC1TDobRhOWWfjDjkeHwqaE5QpAxB2r5gUKZYLea9gtFKyGF1JZcwmjIy6VTksGr ZOZ0D98CeAVMkj3xKvZZbfZOQgw//TOBW1JQdoOr8MX/NPD7IGdTqwra3z1LBZKkmItz 1Iiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=tykJLQE5klS6qONpSqSCrSj1VqgRnsaaRGuXJb8bYV0=; b=S+di71DuX0Dyl47maE+I6z5Qag4Zp7VWNMcmR/CNau0cEbx+9nWqE47HXh0vFuHogf 7nmpEXbGisgwkuNgwp89TOZDJvEVZfekWsf2MuOS6vJyNhb/j1oI4S2pHq/LWBm0iWPQ DJGBdWyJsGVcCZbMNuOSb25udj0wNvavFME4B7pB0LIJdzpp0KXHp22asioizc3woQo4 OPR5MMsm6f47i56H2lLeOD6D2sB2GEOxHEb/gIJpzIOEkG9JFwTCB5WdNBFqb7oT/NQF CXpCF/kRp4weEByrioeoor9qrLP06U5ilKfAMYUi5CDERLbmxq+wftbB5FzF6YsZyEHR V6Cw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3XR2D2PPf8EkLM12z1XJvTM396AXOd5+L6WXC1AwVHJpoAFhVTx9CAStwo3L+8pg==
X-Received: by 10.200.1.203 with SMTP id b11mr7398177qtg.33.1490110426949; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o16sm14939060qkl.67.2017.03.21.08.33.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <5B05F786-D3AE-481F-B678-F124151306D4@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_76BD045F-EB7B-452E-A25A-21FCD604D1A7"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:33:43 -0400
In-Reply-To: <FB20F132-DF78-4CBB-8DB5-42AA67D5AD2A@rfc1035.com>
Cc: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, IETF dnsop Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
References: <E07AFAEB-2B84-4610-87E7-94CF32CF3761@fugue.com> <7652B138-FEAB-4138-91FB-D71AFE6BEF2C@vigilsec.com> <6DCFBC9D-666A-4A3C-A418-82BB6AE3D25D@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703210928390.28925@bofh.nohats.ca> <B1F8C6D6-7160-4BB0-B8A4-39D0027A52C1@gmail.com> <20170321150008.6D5C0671EB83@rock.dv.isc.org> <FB20F132-DF78-4CBB-8DB5-42AA67D5AD2A@rfc1035.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/SktjuKM9neo1nWF3O19o7g4uBkA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:36:03 -0000

On Mar 21, 2017, at 11:11 AM, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
> That doesn't mean their decision was the right one. In retrospect, the stand-off in this WG and between the IETF and ICANN about "special" TLDs (for some definition of special) suggests they made a poor choice.

What stand-off?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email