Re: [DNSOP] RZERC Draft Documents For Review

Tim April <ietf@tapril.net> Fri, 15 January 2021 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@tapril.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63E53A108E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:46:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MTb9v3nZrjhC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:46:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-f180.google.com (mail-qt1-f180.google.com [209.85.160.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 347E93A1084 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:46:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-f180.google.com with SMTP id e15so6743326qte.9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:46:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CG9AI9p25IefHCfRdNtcwcJSbkuJjnjFtIPVD/yD7js=; b=sPEuHbsiPAJJFq6B8z02jViLPk4Ta76bqhy46x9BUcCW3EUMnZUUTb4GGy7Zz8UWkj BgezE1O3elFeI0pMDj7ch/VHq0Qs2+VYBdqwXcwg92BCv40nMXGWTWoic9ZnMeu0rSla /SvIMw1gzqeIvkM/xeDT1omBzIhtMb/IV2FppRJ0e1pMIg2p9Jx6mWLSNIUs85cEUU+0 g+LSDWFiTNsQeSETCdJX7aqb5ow0Ir6ZGO0+Kn1zmdYa8IK2vUccAXBWE8+Dk5oTplKZ lBvmGYs7zShmMq3mgURIOmrR0EEDe1bqdzWi1D0XI1gd3SpcVGRagLuHMzBy2ATW8FKM 3/5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531kcZUt2OixoKV4ary7adZhQ3DfG/4/ex2g7p0hGo/hb/w9JFtz ZBrr3zoWHZ6Jt5DRQtUk4HL7xROGPvPPgw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzzasE6+XushuYl8Z3LZKlzBg5cSK6Rq3apwq/ml7m8hRyzla/x2HXN39OTfuL7MdrqSEcw2w==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5286:: with SMTP id s6mr13166094qtn.22.1610736392558; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:46:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [100.64.0.1] ([2601:191:200:188b:1da3:c487:6e25:43e5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h26sm5510256qtc.81.2021.01.15.10.46.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:46:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Tim April <ietf@tapril.net>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Cc: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:46:30 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5676)
Message-ID: <08F32150-B2E1-4587-967F-6663F0D61A42@tapril.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iL+rir_-CD8JfZPiiwgx2JEfVX19wUYiBTs1xpqbQrgmg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1EC6E61D-BD80-43EB-9A86-13191889AE20@tapril.net> <E0AB68A6-83B9-4ACB-AD6A-24A8A435E039@tapril.net> <CAHbrMsD828qEku7_ni1v5vF5Qgf0EnAZu3KjSXrZh-8UHoYayg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iL+rir_-CD8JfZPiiwgx2JEfVX19wUYiBTs1xpqbQrgmg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/T-SBcbjVOuHlSOD1HNcioi9HEgI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] RZERC Draft Documents For Review
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 18:46:36 -0000

Thank you Warren and Ben for your feedback.

If anyone else has any feedback, questions, or concerns please let me 
know over the weekend so I can prepare any discussion items before the 
RZERC call next Tuesday.

Thank You!

—Tim

On 7 Jan 2021, at 9:22, Warren Kumari wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 9:34 PM Ben Schwartz
> <bemasc=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> I support the deployment of ZONEMD in the root zone.  This is a 
>> valuable protection today and a prerequisite for many of the 
>> proposals in DPRIVE.
>
> Unsurprisingly, me too.
>
> The root is the poster child for ZONEMD...
>
> W
>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:26 PM Tim April 
>> <ietf=40tapril.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello DNSOP,
>>>
>>> Forwarding along to DNSOP as well. If you have any comments or 
>>> feedback on the two proposed RZERC documents, please let me know by 
>>> January 15th.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> --tim
>>>
>>> Forwarded message:
>>>
>>> From: Tim April ietf@tapril.net
>>> To: ietf@ietf.org
>>> Cc: iab@iab.org
>>> Subject: RZERC Draft Documents For Review
>>> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:49:06 -0500
>>>
>>> Hello IETF,
>>>
>>> I wanted to provide a quick update on the work going on in the 
>>> RZERC. We have been discussing and iterating on the two documents 
>>> attached and we have reached the point where we would like to gather 
>>> feedback from the various constituencies represented in the RZERC. 
>>> As your local member, I will be collecting any feedback on the 
>>> documents ahead of our next meeting on the 19th of January. If 
>>> possible, please provide any feedback here or directly to me the 
>>> 15th of January.
>>>
>>> Document 1: Recommendations Regarding Signing Root Zone Name Server 
>>> Data - This document outlines the benefits and potential concerns 
>>> related to signing the root-servers.net zone. It recommends that the 
>>> ICANN org conduct studies into the impact that signing the 
>>> root-servers.net zone might have.
>>>
>>> Document 2: Adding Zone Data Protections to the Root Zone - This 
>>> document discusses recommends that the Root Server Operators, Public 
>>> Technical Identifiers and the Root Zone Maintainer do the necessary 
>>> work to create a plan for deploying ZONEMD, ensuring that it would 
>>> not negatively impact the distribution of the zone data to the Root 
>>> Server System. It also recommends that the DNS and Internet 
>>> community be notified of the changes all under the assumption that 
>>> draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest becomes an RFC.
>>>
>>> Again, if you have any comments or feedback on the documents, please 
>>> provide them be January 15th.
>>>
>>> --tim
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DNSOP mailing list
>>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
>
>
> -- 
> The computing scientist’s main challenge is not to get confused by 
> the
> complexities of his own making.
>   -- E. W. Dijkstra