Re: [DNSOP] On painting the draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc bikeshed

Erik Nygren <erik+ietf@nygren.org> Tue, 19 November 2019 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <nygren@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A49612091F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:32:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.405
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.405 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.244, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3xaKGLf0V3tI for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:32:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com (mail-wm1-f54.google.com [209.85.128.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3422E120887 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:32:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id t26so3625386wmi.4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:32:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2ZrsrddyXDEauPCmUE/Vhztku4UoiHpt/7EvlIrihL0=; b=OOtBu0UjKAVwAJrazo5jlS1/D5jbhmZpKD9v/+ttbupjAulD4ZJKEfOQeddHSibMhk 7FvnuisIAk9PQiSwXueqxVUYRQyVi/qz0lg5Uk7w+mbVR1nnFPVKiw7Y5DkmICFFoRfJ SnPRiTTktJV9PHkrD4ykt9N4FiOM5dD1Idzq/qu77zij3TMoj/dmZ/j7kaNN3twegcoe xwi68B/uUTyFaBYa5lWTUJ7cq7ojEeqfUU8+OKPssOMGwYcdl3GGf1U+9w8k1+wGUWc/ eB1OJkGJPg+tpIQZgwyMeyl7RoTdPdRjc8v3ah+GVu28LnT9k5kRHB/P/qN8ZvPA2JME 8mDg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXwCLOhp2JRUOLA1qasAaFiKqRgV/c7agMxF+9o3U8Qh+tuJ59/ 9jczjIBrw+UpUr4KC2j6Clx7ktfwFRam/V23aJgIrA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwcUQp4zSetNoD33qpQoeiJF2QazNb4rW3wWlnfazALvR9MNjjj0bkWZcuqNq+MIcFpFZuTEjEeYgJi5yO4u/w=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:80c7:: with SMTP id b190mr5838984wmd.3.1574170353285; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:32:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DDA7EA96-5B03-4F03-83DE-AFEC82A74DA7@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <DDA7EA96-5B03-4F03-83DE-AFEC82A74DA7@apple.com>
From: Erik Nygren <erik+ietf@nygren.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:32:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKC-DJhX6gZh2pRqfc8n-NanZ1ESjCemyOifsBD22LJ6aTiPxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b93cd60597b31810"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/T3643wYtw74tOl3iXtYHn01IsBY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On painting the draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc bikeshed
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:32:37 -0000

Some of my current leanings:

SVCB and HTTPB  (SVCB and HTTPSB)

Of even shorter:  "SB" and "HSB"

(I also prefer SVCHTTPS over HTTPSSVC as the latter is way too easy to
leave out one of the S's.)

I'd considered just calling "SVCB" as "B" but that makes it harder to
search for.
This is also why "HTTP" or "HTTPS" are dispreferred is that they are hard
to search for.

HTTP(S) is more than just the Web which is why I'd be disinclined to use
WEB in the name.

  Erik


On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 5:39 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=
40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hello DNSOP,
>
> In the interest of getting this spec ready to go, I want to start our
> bikeshed on the RRTYPE name. We need a stable name that we all can live
> with.
>
> I'll start. Please chime in!
>
> Since it seems that many people like SVCB, and many don't like HTTPSSVC
> (too many repeated SS's!), I suggest using:
>
> SVCB (referred to as "Service Binding")
>
> SVCB-HTTPS (referred to as"Service Binding for HTTPS")
>
>
> Best,
> Tommy
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>