[DNSOP] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-09

Nicolai Leymann via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 04 July 2024 06:45 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.2.3] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9CDC1840C4; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 23:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nicolai Leymann via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: dnsdir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.17.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172007555950.1130432.1072563780257446200@dt-datatracker-5f88556585-g8gwj>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 23:45:59 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: EY2FNEAMUITGDXBOR4N632Q4LDPIMZGW
X-Message-ID-Hash: EY2FNEAMUITGDXBOR4N632Q4LDPIMZGW
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Nicolai Leymann <n.leymann@telekom.de>
Subject: [DNSOP] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-09
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/TMZoF6cm_JEmcY5BdmP4EimaJLA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

Reviewer: Nicolai Leymann
Review result: Ready

I am the designated DNS Directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion.
This is the third review I am doing - in my last review on the -08 version I 
came to the conclusion that the document is ready for publication. 

The draft is going to be published as Informational RFC. The document is well 
written and defines an EDNS option which can be used for debugging purposes.

There were only a few minor changes on making the document more clear and 
readable compared to the -08 version from my last review. In addition 
several references were added.

Overall I think the document is ready for publication.