Re: [DNSOP] Another look - draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-05.txt

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 29 March 2018 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D99312D956; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6qNoBGgZZJW8; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 872421250B8; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id w2TKsIDc015377 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:54:18 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1522356859; bh=HFUuBoo5mwqalr5ZiMa1zrYebmSvxFRI1iuSh+hwKpM=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=rPg3sZwZYJh+Bj/agmudRamXqKQ85221qTSL2cONZeY9d4E+jQW4eA5+BKfoCjaxg /UU28VJEuSB629gVWRJEBf84F6a74FKZ5JIPz+osRx7/R4bSfOGnUbVZdf9ym/EwXB HFKudyRR+uD00kbzMndExOuBnMR+P1dhIh7TtEvg=
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art@ietf.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <f7b85bac-b050-5003-2df0-a48b1ef2f929@dcrocker.net> <e1f41670-ada8-eaac-468c-c712b338a10b@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1803201804440.8940@dhcp-8344.meeting.ietf.org> <A7711F58-5145-49E8-9158-B2F94D0EABBF@redbarn.org> <7c168dc1-2ea7-d47e-78b7-0380e5d0aa84@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1803211104210.9553@ary.local> <5244d327-f8ea-1590-c663-1d92e0b194c4@dcrocker.net> <5F44FA5B42805C52479DE491@PSB> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1803211507380.9666@dhcp-935d.meeting.ietf.org> <1DF1564CC2B88726B2B54CF4@PSB> <20180326171842.0eacbdc4@smaug.local.partim.de> <32837C4DF5CB5BDD00DAD0FD@PSB> <fe24bb1d-a2e2-c50a-4293-b9c4cadcfc69@dcrocker.net> <C10EFF0FB6AC68625A75D485@PSB> <CAHw9_i+69CGrZnW6XqvP6Qk1Cw+QoFKHCzqO4Hb=C6UkDvZkVg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <e18bc940-184c-1031-b24b-d549d126dff4@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:52:44 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+69CGrZnW6XqvP6Qk1Cw+QoFKHCzqO4Hb=C6UkDvZkVg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/TSTCPvmr4xiGr_4UkMsa6GOMTak>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Another look - draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-05.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 20:52:54 -0000

On 3/29/2018 1:45 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> I don't want to get into if this is the*right*  behavior or not, but
> it seems like worth mentioning in the draft as it has much background
> already...
> I can find nothing which states that A / AAAA cannot be associated
> with underscore names, but they sure don't seem to work in practice.


The current version is:

    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf/

Please suggest specific text to use and where to put it.

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net