Re: [DNSOP] The Larger Discussion on Differences in Response Drafts

[George Michaelson <[e-mail]>]

my bad. I've been re-framed.

Contextually, PUSH means (to me at least) 'do this promiscuously' and
PULL means (to me at least) 'do this if asked' -which is not what I
previously understood.

In that case, I think PULL makes more sense: do this, if the client
signals its what it wants. Otherwise, don't do this. Its the POLA
behaviour.

(thanks for Paul Hoffman's cluestick hit)

-G

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Tim Wicinski <[e-mail]> wrote:
> All,
>
>
> In Berlin we had two presentations on different methods of returning
> multiple responses:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-dnsop-multiple-responses/
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes/
>
> and a presentation in Buenos Aires:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vavrusa-dnsop-aaaa-for-free/
>
> All of these documents are attempting to solve a larger problem in different
> ways.
> The end result is "Return Associated Answer" to the client.
>
> The question is starting to coalesce around these two premises:
>
> - Do we want to Server to PUSH any or all Associated Answers, or
>
> - Do we want the Client to PULL any or all Associated Answers, or
>
> - Do we want the Status Quo?
>
> thanks
> tim
>
>
>
> (Thanks to Paul Hoffman for assistance)
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop