Re: [DNSOP] call for agenda items, IETF 98

Suzanne Woolf <> Wed, 01 March 2017 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D4C129882 for <>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:19:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TvPXF3Q0KLBq for <>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:19:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF1CA129878 for <>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:19:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id n186so84350893qkb.3 for <>; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:19:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=NP7/KrsnKw9PRA9M4gexCn6lkOyKf2p2bFcYTvpKzbM=; b=Ri6VJB3AskdOa6rAj4T/LaEVqrQ9ywdjyTZy2zHgXuidMOXGizseDmHQoUAcYQ1RUj q3MTwdZUKMXrLO12SOAJCZuah4pUMb/hPbMgPC8g0drI0NwZPmx7ZXpUHsIiN0K5mCHc Iq0aS/0nBxGVfbXnIsjvdbT0+A+B/aTkSMkx5yLJqsXIYW65gj7wRVbhv4yF+ejZRidG SztwQuTrLkTMa2f5pSaZrpnnZdbLrTC9Riz1S56AwksPhHk4aHfwuv4l26ibRXgKaMZG lZofH54OxnEzq18Q0oBEHohLQVmKT30YEAW+vRHpBhiXpHm703k4I+bPF44LQZFEOGgi OO2w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=NP7/KrsnKw9PRA9M4gexCn6lkOyKf2p2bFcYTvpKzbM=; b=FadH36hZXoI9OVHBc4l4hDjrX1+I0Q1A85IvpTD2VyshEpp5UO0GXrCVeHAclqTwj0 tuI7J0k7/+MieFKHF41VxmiBtmvzlgRF6AJs7+nZw5DqZAH61UKIlSnpVPp+Sqnd+rTP 7/tQqcs6M3KTX0Q+RTyMhDDPkPA0G5ByOBncOfPld9vq48XBd9+u2CPws1Sqn3at+mCj tKjRj+aLA09YmC2CUryDCsh6HVn+xFhsxSroURCvuMuIEbmbRC99yNKUIxnlFT4/bqV2 H2XW4rDKVTs6688WbE3At7NFRD4l8l9i+0YtoPBV6p4o2Dv30fk6shqeAPpdMNb/J+CJ hnKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lv3QYrHIeThhRgIhhMFA80tf1AEcJTWiEgn3SvVUjFj60wh4GkXJFJAUL3fB91fw==
X-Received: by with SMTP id w17mr11882149qtg.36.1488395968748; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:19:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:181:c381:c20:e5ca:383c:3105:6200? ([2601:181:c381:c20:e5ca:383c:3105:6200]) by with ESMTPSA id q5sm3762143qtc.36.2017. (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Mar 2017 11:19:28 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Suzanne Woolf <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:19:26 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <>
To: Paul Hoffman <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <>
Cc: dnsop <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] call for agenda items, IETF 98
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:19:31 -0000


This is a good point, thanks Paul.

If you’re an editor on a WG document, please consider what you need from the WG to get it ready for a Working Group Last Call.  If you’re missing reviews/reviewers, the chairs/secretary are happy to help you find some. If you need input from the WG, please ask for it.

If you’ve been meaning to review a Working Group document, why not make it part of your prep for IETF 98?

And if you want to propose new work, please remember you’ll need reviewers and editors, and pay it forward by reviewing a current draft or two :-)


> On Mar 1, 2017, at 10:51 AM, Paul Hoffman <> wrote:
> <secretary-hat on>
> As you are thinking of agenda requests, please look at
> There are a lot of WG documents for which we haven't heard much discussion *on the list*. Instead, we seem to hear more about documents that are "Candidate for WG adoption" or document that people want in that category.
> It would be grand if we could have more discussion about any of the WG documents on the list before having presentations in the face-to-face meeting: that makes the meeting time more useful.
> --Paul Hoffman
> <secretary-hat off>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list